313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30677552)
1. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.
McCarthy SN; Henchion M; White A; Brandon K; Allen P
Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():118-124. PubMed ID: 28522169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.
Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2434-2442. PubMed ID: 29606159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regional, socioeconomic and behavioural- impacts on consumer acceptability of beef in Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Great Britain.
Chong FS; Farmer LJ; Hagan TDJ; Speers JS; Sanderson DW; Devlin DJ; Tollerton IJ; Gordon AW; Methven L; Moloney AP; Kerry JP; O'Sullivan MG
Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():86-95. PubMed ID: 31022586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of Japanese and Australian consumers' sensory perceptions of beef.
Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R
Anim Sci J; 2014 Jan; 85(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23773578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of taste in willingness-to-pay valuations of sirloin steaks from postextraction algal residue-fed cattle.
Johnson MD; Miller RK; Morrill JC; Anderson DP; Wickersham TA; Sawyer JE; Richardson JW; Palma MA
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):3072-83. PubMed ID: 27482694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology.
Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R
Anim Sci J; 2011 Apr; 82(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 21729214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers' preferences and willingness to pay.
Risius A; Hamm U
Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():9-14. PubMed ID: 27792916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumers' preference and willingness to pay for graded beef in Polokwane municipality, South Africa.
Makweya FL; Oluwatayo IB
Ital J Food Saf; 2019 Mar; 8(1):7654. PubMed ID: 31008083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of the effect of brand and product identification on consumer palatability ratings of ground beef patties.
Wilfong AK; McKillip KV; Gonzalez JM; Houser TA; Unruh JA; Boyle EA; O'Quinn TG
J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4943-4958. PubMed ID: 27898955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polish consumer categorisation of grilled beef at 6 mm and 25 mm thickness into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology.
Pogorzelski G; Woźniak K; Polkinghorne R; Półtorak A; Wierzbicka A
Meat Sci; 2020 Mar; 161():107953. PubMed ID: 31675648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Where's the beef? Retail channel choice and beef preferences in Argentina.
Colella F; Ortega DL
Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():86-94. PubMed ID: 28662454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consumer perception of health properties and of other attributes of beef as determinants of consumption and purchase decisions.
Gutkowska K; Czarnecki J; Głąbska D; Guzek D; Batóg A
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2018; 69(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 30525333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer preferences for beef with improved nutrient profile1.
Flowers S; McFadden BR; Carr CC; Mateescu RG
J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4699-4709. PubMed ID: 31628839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of cooking in consumers' quality formation: An exploratory study of beef steaks.
Kang N; Panzone L; Kuznesof S
Meat Sci; 2022 Apr; 186():108730. PubMed ID: 35051874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
