These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30677552)

  • 21. Effects of marbling and shear force on consumers' willingness to pay for beef strip loin steaks.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Koontz SR; Chapman PL; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):890-9. PubMed ID: 15753345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strategies to predict and improve eating quality of cooked beef using carcass and meat composition traits in Angus cattle.
    Mateescu RG; Oltenacu PA; Garmyn AJ; Mafi GG; VanOverbeke DL
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):2160-71. PubMed ID: 27285712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.
    de-Magistris T; Lopéz-Galán B
    Public Health; 2016 Jun; 135():83-90. PubMed ID: 26996310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Beef choice.
    Ngapo TM; Braña Varela D; Rubio Lozano MS
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():34-43. PubMed ID: 28750333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors associated with consumer perception and conduct toward certified beef from Brazil.
    Brunoro JRP; Lopes MA; Demeu FA; Bruhn FRP; Rigueira LL; Faria PB; Rocha CMBMD; Contini E; Pacheco EO; Maia ÉM; Junqueira LV
    J Food Sci; 2020 May; 85(5):1542-1547. PubMed ID: 32271959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system.
    Legrand I; Hocquette JF; Polkinghorne RJ; Pethick DW
    Animal; 2013 Mar; 7(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 23031268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of sequential information on consumers' willingness to pay for credence food attributes.
    Botelho A; Dinis I; Lourenço-Gomes L; Moreira J; Costa Pinto L; Simões O
    Appetite; 2017 Nov; 118():17-25. PubMed ID: 28760349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Credence cues of pork are more important than consumers' culinary skills to boost their purchasing intention.
    Argemí-Armengol I; Villalba D; Ripoll G; Teixeira A; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():11-21. PubMed ID: 30954794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aging implications on fresh muscle traits of Certified Angus Beef steaks.
    Adcock LA; Sawyer JT; Lambert BD; Jones TN; Ball JJ; Wyatt RP; Jackson J
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Dec; 93(12):5863-72. PubMed ID: 26641197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Review: Beef-eating quality: a European journey.
    Farmer LJ; Farrell DT
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2424-2433. PubMed ID: 30004320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does a single adjustment in the meat standards Australia beef grading model cater for different hormonal growth promotant formulations?
    Packer DT; McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
    Animal; 2021 May; 15(5):100196. PubMed ID: 34029795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks.
    Behrends JM; Goodson KJ; Koohmaraie M; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Wise JW; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 15705763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The purchase willingness of consumers for red meat in China.
    Wang B; Shen C; Cai Y; Liu D; Gai S
    Meat Sci; 2022 Oct; 192():108908. PubMed ID: 35878434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emerging markets for imported beef in China: Results from a consumer choice experiment in Beijing.
    Ortega DL; Hong SJ; Wang HH; Wu L
    Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():317-323. PubMed ID: 27395825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consumer sensory evaluation and chemical composition of beef gluteus medius and triceps brachii steaks from cattle finished on forage or concentrate diets.
    Chail A; Legako JF; Pitcher LR; Ward RE; Martini S; MacAdam JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 28464115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yogurt.
    Napolitano F; Pacelli C; Girolami A; Braghieri A
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Mar; 91(3):910-7. PubMed ID: 18292246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of packaging on consumer eating quality of beef.
    Polkinghorne RJ; Philpott J; Perovic J; Lau J; Davies L; Mudannayake W; Watson R; Tarr G; Thompson JM
    Meat Sci; 2018 Aug; 142():59-64. PubMed ID: 29660545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contributions of tenderness, juiciness and flavor liking to overall liking of beef in Europe.
    Liu J; Ellies-Oury MP; Chriki S; Legrand I; Pogorzelski G; Wierzbicki J; Farmer L; Troy D; Polkinghorne R; Hocquette JF
    Meat Sci; 2020 Oct; 168():108190. PubMed ID: 32450455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A South African beef quality survey.
    van Wyngaard BE; Strydom PE; Hugo A
    Meat Sci; 2023 Apr; 198():109109. PubMed ID: 36702065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.