These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30677552)

  • 41. Eating quality prediction of beef from Italian Simmental cattle based on experts' steak assessment.
    Borgogno M; Saccà E; Corazzin M; Favotto S; Bovolenta S; Piasentier E
    Meat Sci; 2016 Aug; 118():1-7. PubMed ID: 26998946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dutch Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare.
    Mulder M; Zomer S
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017; 20(2):137-154. PubMed ID: 28166413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Willingness to pay for whole turkey attributes during Thanksgiving holiday shopping in the United States.
    Bir CL; Olynk Widmar NJ; Davis MK; Erasmus MA; Zuelly S
    Poult Sci; 2020 May; 99(5):2798-2810. PubMed ID: 32359617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
    Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs.
    Ali BM; Ang F; van der Fels-Klerx HJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260488. PubMed ID: 34874958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Classification and characterization of Japanese consumers' beef preferences by external preference mapping.
    Sasaki K; Ooi M; Nagura N; Motoyama M; Narita T; Oe M; Nakajima I; Hagi T; Ojima K; Kobayashi M; Nomura M; Muroya S; Hayashi T; Akama K; Fujikawa A; Hokiyama H; Kobayashi K; Nishimura T
    J Sci Food Agric; 2017 Aug; 97(10):3453-3462. PubMed ID: 28071797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preferences for lamb meat: a choice experiment for Spanish consumers.
    Gracia A; de-Magistris T
    Meat Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 23747635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sheep meat consumers in Mexico: Understanding their perceptions, habits, preferences and market segments.
    Alanís PJ; Miranda-de la Lama GC; Mariezcurrena-Berasain MA; Barbabosa-Pliego A; Rayas-Amor AA; Estévez-Moreno LX
    Meat Sci; 2022 Feb; 184():108705. PubMed ID: 34768180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
    Sonoda Y; Oishi K; Chomei Y; Hirooka H
    Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Understanding the role of information and taste heterogeneity in consumer preferences for functional beef: The case of the omega-3 enriched burger.
    Boncinelli F; Piracci G; Casini L
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108614. PubMed ID: 34229235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries.
    Verbeke W; Van Wezemael L; de Barcellos MD; Kügler JO; Hocquette JF; Ueland Ø; Grunert KG
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 19961887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Effect of Consumer Involvement in Light Lamb Meat on Behavior, Sensory Perception, and Health-Related Concerns.
    Ripoll G; Panea B
    Nutrients; 2019 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 31141913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.
    Martínez Michel L; Anders S; Wismer WV
    J Food Sci; 2011 Oct; 76(8):S469-77. PubMed ID: 22417604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Meat standards and grading: a world view.
    Polkinghorne RJ; Thompson JM
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):227-35. PubMed ID: 20541325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of branding on consumer palatability ratings of beef strip loin steaks.
    Wilfong AK; McKillip KV; Gonzalez JM; Houser TA; Unruh JA; Boyle EA; O'Quinn TG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4930-4942. PubMed ID: 27898970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland.
    Żakowska-Biemans S; Pieniak Z; Gutkowska K; Wierzbicki J; Cieszyńska K; Sajdakowska M; Kosicka-Gębska M
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():105-113. PubMed ID: 27865127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Consumers' perception and purchase behaviour of meat in China.
    Kantono K; Hamid N; Ma Q; Chadha D; Oey I
    Meat Sci; 2021 Sep; 179():108548. PubMed ID: 33993070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rural-urban differences in willingness to pay for organic vegetables: Evidence from Vietnam.
    Ha TM; Shakur S; Pham Do KH
    Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104273. PubMed ID: 31150771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diversity of Japanese consumers' requirements, sensory perceptions, and eating preferences for meat.
    Sasaki K
    Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13705. PubMed ID: 35266248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.