These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30678103)
1. Integrated FISH, Karyotyping and aCGH Analyses for Effective Prenatal Diagnosis of Common Aneuploidies and Other Cytogenomic Abnormalities. Chai H; DiAdamo A; Grommisch B; Boyle J; Amato K; Wang D; Wen J; Li P Med Sci (Basel); 2019 Jan; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 30678103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Retrospective Analysis of 10-Year Data Assessed the Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Cytogenomic Abnormalities in Current Prenatal and Pediatric Settings. Chai H; DiAdamo A; Grommisch B; Xu F; Zhou Q; Wen J; Mahoney M; Bale A; McGrath J; Spencer-Manzon M; Li P; Zhang H Front Genet; 2019; 10():1162. PubMed ID: 31850057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage. Capalbo A; Wright G; Elliott T; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Nagy ZP Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2298-307. PubMed ID: 23739221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test. Carey L; Scott F; Murphy K; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Leigh D; Robertson R; McLennan A Prenat Diagn; 2014 May; 34(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 24453008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases. Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics. Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Mar; 37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20494259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnosis of aneuploidy with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); value in pregnancies with increased risk for chromosome aberrations]. Ulmer R; Pfeiffer RA; Kollert A; Beinder E Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2000; 204(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10721179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inconsistency of Karyotyping and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) in a Mosaic Turner Syndrome Case. Tulay P; Ergoren MC; Alkaya A; Yayci E; Sag SO; Temel SG Glob Med Genet; 2020 Dec; 7(4):128-132. PubMed ID: 33693446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Spectrum of Cytogenomic Abnormalities Revealed by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on Products of Conception Culture Failure and Normal Karyotype Samples. Zhou Q; Wu SY; Amato K; DiAdamo A; Li P J Genet Genomics; 2016 Mar; 43(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 27020032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in and Efficacies of Indications for Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenomic Abnormalities: 13 Years of Experience in a Single Center. Meng J; Matarese C; Crivello J; Wilcox K; Wang D; DiAdamo A; Xu F; Li P Med Sci Monit; 2015 Jul; 21():1942-8. PubMed ID: 26143093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory. Petersen AK; Cheung SW; Smith JL; Bi W; Ward PA; Peacock S; Braxton A; Van Den Veyver IB; Breman AM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 217(6):691.e1-691.e6. PubMed ID: 29032050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing. Vera-Rodríguez M; Michel CE; Mercader A; Bladon AJ; Rodrigo L; Kokocinski F; Mateu E; Al-Asmar N; Blesa D; Simón C; Rubio C Fertil Steril; 2016 Apr; 105(4):1047-1055.e2. PubMed ID: 26776911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal mosaicism of sex chromosome causes discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing. Wang L; Meng Q; Tang X; Yin T; Zhang J; Yang S; Wang X; Wu H; Shi Q; Jenkins EC; Zhong N; Gu Y Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 54(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 26522104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mosaic isochromosome 20q at amniocentesis: Prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling and literature review. Chen CP; Chern SR; Wu PS; Chen SW; Wu FT; Town DD; Wang W Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 58(6):855-858. PubMed ID: 31759542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Van den Veyver IB; Patel A; Shaw CA; Pursley AN; Kang SH; Simovich MJ; Ward PA; Darilek S; Johnson A; Neill SE; Bi W; White LD; Eng CM; Lupski JR; Cheung SW; Beaudet AL Prenat Diagn; 2009 Jan; 29(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19012303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion. Gao J; Liu C; Yao F; Hao N; Zhou J; Zhou Q; Zhang L; Liu X; Bian X; Liu J Mol Cytogenet; 2012 Jul; 5(1):33. PubMed ID: 22794168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confirmation of mosaicism and uniparental disomy in amniocytes, after detection of mosaic chromosome abnormalities in chorionic villi. Grati FR; Grimi B; Frascoli G; Di Meco AM; Liuti R; Milani S; Trotta A; Dulcetti F; Grosso E; Miozzo M; Maggi F; Simoni G Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Mar; 14(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 16418738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)--diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986-1992. Hahnemann JM; Vejerslev LO Prenat Diagn; 1997 Sep; 17(9):801-20. PubMed ID: 9316125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]