171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30678103)
1. Integrated FISH, Karyotyping and aCGH Analyses for Effective Prenatal Diagnosis of Common Aneuploidies and Other Cytogenomic Abnormalities.
Chai H; DiAdamo A; Grommisch B; Boyle J; Amato K; Wang D; Wen J; Li P
Med Sci (Basel); 2019 Jan; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 30678103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Retrospective Analysis of 10-Year Data Assessed the Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Cytogenomic Abnormalities in Current Prenatal and Pediatric Settings.
Chai H; DiAdamo A; Grommisch B; Xu F; Zhou Q; Wen J; Mahoney M; Bale A; McGrath J; Spencer-Manzon M; Li P; Zhang H
Front Genet; 2019; 10():1162. PubMed ID: 31850057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage.
Capalbo A; Wright G; Elliott T; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Nagy ZP
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2298-307. PubMed ID: 23739221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test.
Carey L; Scott F; Murphy K; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Leigh D; Robertson R; McLennan A
Prenat Diagn; 2014 May; 34(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 24453008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.
Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M
Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics.
Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Mar; 37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20494259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnosis of aneuploidy with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); value in pregnancies with increased risk for chromosome aberrations].
Ulmer R; Pfeiffer RA; Kollert A; Beinder E
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2000; 204(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10721179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inconsistency of Karyotyping and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) in a Mosaic Turner Syndrome Case.
Tulay P; Ergoren MC; Alkaya A; Yayci E; Sag SO; Temel SG
Glob Med Genet; 2020 Dec; 7(4):128-132. PubMed ID: 33693446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Spectrum of Cytogenomic Abnormalities Revealed by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on Products of Conception Culture Failure and Normal Karyotype Samples.
Zhou Q; Wu SY; Amato K; DiAdamo A; Li P
J Genet Genomics; 2016 Mar; 43(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 27020032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in and Efficacies of Indications for Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenomic Abnormalities: 13 Years of Experience in a Single Center.
Meng J; Matarese C; Crivello J; Wilcox K; Wang D; DiAdamo A; Xu F; Li P
Med Sci Monit; 2015 Jul; 21():1942-8. PubMed ID: 26143093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory.
Petersen AK; Cheung SW; Smith JL; Bi W; Ward PA; Peacock S; Braxton A; Van Den Veyver IB; Breman AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 217(6):691.e1-691.e6. PubMed ID: 29032050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing.
Vera-Rodríguez M; Michel CE; Mercader A; Bladon AJ; Rodrigo L; Kokocinski F; Mateu E; Al-Asmar N; Blesa D; Simón C; Rubio C
Fertil Steril; 2016 Apr; 105(4):1047-1055.e2. PubMed ID: 26776911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jansen FA; Blumenfeld YJ; Fisher A; Cobben JM; Odibo AO; Borrell A; Haak MC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 25319878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal mosaicism of sex chromosome causes discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing.
Wang L; Meng Q; Tang X; Yin T; Zhang J; Yang S; Wang X; Wu H; Shi Q; Jenkins EC; Zhong N; Gu Y
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 54(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 26522104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mosaic isochromosome 20q at amniocentesis: Prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling and literature review.
Chen CP; Chern SR; Wu PS; Chen SW; Wu FT; Town DD; Wang W
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 58(6):855-858. PubMed ID: 31759542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases.
Van den Veyver IB; Patel A; Shaw CA; Pursley AN; Kang SH; Simovich MJ; Ward PA; Darilek S; Johnson A; Neill SE; Bi W; White LD; Eng CM; Lupski JR; Cheung SW; Beaudet AL
Prenat Diagn; 2009 Jan; 29(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19012303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion.
Gao J; Liu C; Yao F; Hao N; Zhou J; Zhou Q; Zhang L; Liu X; Bian X; Liu J
Mol Cytogenet; 2012 Jul; 5(1):33. PubMed ID: 22794168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confirmation of mosaicism and uniparental disomy in amniocytes, after detection of mosaic chromosome abnormalities in chorionic villi.
Grati FR; Grimi B; Frascoli G; Di Meco AM; Liuti R; Milani S; Trotta A; Dulcetti F; Grosso E; Miozzo M; Maggi F; Simoni G
Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Mar; 14(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 16418738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)--diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986-1992.
Hahnemann JM; Vejerslev LO
Prenat Diagn; 1997 Sep; 17(9):801-20. PubMed ID: 9316125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
