These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30678480)

  • 1. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in the evaluation of breast suspicious calcifications: diagnostic accuracy and impact on surgical management.
    Houben IP; Vanwetswinkel S; Kalia V; Thywissen T; Nelemans PJ; Heuts EM; Smidt ML; Meyer-Baese A; Wildberger JE; Lobbes M
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Sep; 60(9):1110-1117. PubMed ID: 30678480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.
    Cheung YC; Tsai HP; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Huang PC; Chen SC
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1082-9. PubMed ID: 26159872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Rasmussen R; Behmer C; Zackrisson S; Ryden L
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 32438917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
    Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical value of suspicious calcification in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast lesions using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography].
    Sun XF; Xing W; Yu SN; Sha YY; Pan L; Chen Q
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jan; 100(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 31914557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
    Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeated surgeries in invasive lobular breast cancer with preoperative MRI: Role of additional carcinoma in situ and background parenchymal enhancement.
    Preibsch H; Richter V; Bahrs SD; Hattermann V; Wietek BM; Bier G; Kloth C; Blumenstock G; Hahn M; Staebler A; Nikolaou K; Wiesinger B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():181-187. PubMed ID: 28583631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.
    Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
    Covington MF
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
    Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved image contrast of calcifications in breast tissue specimens using diffraction enhanced imaging.
    Kiss MZ; Sayers DE; Zhong Z; Parham C; Pisano ED
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(15):3427-39. PubMed ID: 15379023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.
    Hauser N; Wang Z; Kubik-Huch RA; Trippel M; Singer G; Hohl MK; Roessl E; Köhler T; van Stevendaal U; Wieberneit N; Stampanoni M
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 24141742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM).
    Amato F; Bicchierai G; Cirone D; Depretto C; Di Naro F; Vanzi E; Scaperrotta G; Bartolotta TV; Miele V; Nori J
    Radiol Med; 2019 Dec; 124(12):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 31773458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative enhancement parameters on contrast-enhanced mammography.
    Kul M; Akkaya S; Kul S
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2024 Jul; 30(4):248-255. PubMed ID: 38619006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Clinical Applications.
    Bhimani C; Matta D; Roth RG; Liao L; Tinney E; Brill K; Germaine P
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 27773458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens.
    Rößler AC; Kalender W; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Preuss C; Peter SC; Brehm B; Hammon M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 27888024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation of ductal carcinoma in-situ from benign micro-calcifications by dedicated breast computed tomography.
    Aminololama-Shakeri S; Abbey CK; Gazi P; Prionas ND; Nosratieh A; Li CS; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 26520874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery.
    Zhang Y; Fukatsu H; Naganawa S; Satake H; Sato Y; Ohiwa M; Endo T; Ichihara S; Ishigaki T
    Breast Cancer; 2002; 9(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 12185335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.