250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30678480)
21. Utilizing digital breast tomosynthesis to improve accuracy of preoperative needle localization for surgical excisional biopsy.
Hasan R; Gavenonis SC; Shin MC
Del Med J; 2015 Apr; 87(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 26027410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Current Status of Contrast Enhanced Mammography: A Comprehensive Review.
Kornecki A
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 34492211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI?
Thibault F; Balleyguier C; Tardivon A; Dromain C
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S162-4. PubMed ID: 23083575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
Patel BK; Ranjbar S; Wu T; Pockaj BA; Li J; Zhang N; Lobbes M; Zhang B; Mitchell JR
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():207-213. PubMed ID: 29279165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Monreal S
Radiol Technol; 2018 May; 89(5):518-520. PubMed ID: 29793915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Appropriate imaging work-up of breast microcalcifications. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
Cardenosa G; Mendelson E; Bassett L; Böhm-Vélez M; D'Orsi C; Evans WP; Monsees B; Thurmond A; Goldstein S
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215 Suppl():973-80. PubMed ID: 11037525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer aided detection system for micro calcifications in digital mammograms.
Mohamed H; Mabrouk MS; Sharawy A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24909786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contamination artifact that mimics in-situ carcinoma on contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Gluskin J; Click M; Fleischman R; Dromain C; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():147-154. PubMed ID: 28987661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with a compact synchrotron source.
Heck L; Dierolf M; Jud C; Eggl E; Sellerer T; Mechlem K; Günther B; Achterhold K; Gleich B; Metz S; Pfeiffer D; Kröninger K; Herzen J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222816. PubMed ID: 31600236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [X-ray mammography : calcifications, masses and architectural distortions].
Fischer U
Radiologe; 2008 Aug; 48(8):785-97, quiz 798. PubMed ID: 18612624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Practical application of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography [CE-MRM] by an algorithm combining morphological and enhancement patterns.
Potente G; Messineo D; Maggi C; Savelli S
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19095407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How Does the Display Luminance Level Affect Detectability of Breast Microcalcifications and Spiculated Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Images?
Ferranti C; Primolevo A; Cartia F; Cavatorta C; Ciniselli CM; Lualdi M; Meroni S; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Scaperrotta G
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 28189505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammogram (2DSM) and conventional full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) for evaluation of breast cancer.
Choi G; Woo OH; Shin HS; Jang S; Cho KR; Seo BK
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():170-174. PubMed ID: 28334617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adjunctive Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging for Detecting Cancer in Women with Calcifications at Mammography.
Chung HW; So Y; Yang JH; Park KS; Yoo YB; Choi N; Kim MY; Kim J; Lee EJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 24(12):3541-3548. PubMed ID: 28819909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contrast-enhanced mammography in the evaluation of breast calcifications: preliminary experience.
Depretto C; Borelli A; Liguori A; Presti G; Vingiani A; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
Tumori; 2020 Dec; 106(6):491-496. PubMed ID: 32515663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
