These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30678480)
21. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Utilizing digital breast tomosynthesis to improve accuracy of preoperative needle localization for surgical excisional biopsy. Hasan R; Gavenonis SC; Shin MC Del Med J; 2015 Apr; 87(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 26027410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results. Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Current Status of Contrast Enhanced Mammography: A Comprehensive Review. Kornecki A Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 34492211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Practical application of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography [CE-MRM] by an algorithm combining morphological and enhancement patterns. Potente G; Messineo D; Maggi C; Savelli S Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19095407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How Does the Display Luminance Level Affect Detectability of Breast Microcalcifications and Spiculated Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Images? Ferranti C; Primolevo A; Cartia F; Cavatorta C; Ciniselli CM; Lualdi M; Meroni S; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Scaperrotta G Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 28189505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammogram (2DSM) and conventional full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) for evaluation of breast cancer. Choi G; Woo OH; Shin HS; Jang S; Cho KR; Seo BK Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():170-174. PubMed ID: 28334617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS. Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adjunctive Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging for Detecting Cancer in Women with Calcifications at Mammography. Chung HW; So Y; Yang JH; Park KS; Yoo YB; Choi N; Kim MY; Kim J; Lee EJ Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 24(12):3541-3548. PubMed ID: 28819909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contrast-enhanced mammography in the evaluation of breast calcifications: preliminary experience. Depretto C; Borelli A; Liguori A; Presti G; Vingiani A; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP Tumori; 2020 Dec; 106(6):491-496. PubMed ID: 32515663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]