These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30678480)

  • 21. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Utilizing digital breast tomosynthesis to improve accuracy of preoperative needle localization for surgical excisional biopsy.
    Hasan R; Gavenonis SC; Shin MC
    Del Med J; 2015 Apr; 87(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 26027410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
    Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Current Status of Contrast Enhanced Mammography: A Comprehensive Review.
    Kornecki A
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 34492211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI?
    Thibault F; Balleyguier C; Tardivon A; Dromain C
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S162-4. PubMed ID: 23083575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
    Patel BK; Ranjbar S; Wu T; Pockaj BA; Li J; Zhang N; Lobbes M; Zhang B; Mitchell JR
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():207-213. PubMed ID: 29279165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
    Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
    Monreal S
    Radiol Technol; 2018 May; 89(5):518-520. PubMed ID: 29793915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Appropriate imaging work-up of breast microcalcifications. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
    Cardenosa G; Mendelson E; Bassett L; Böhm-Vélez M; D'Orsi C; Evans WP; Monsees B; Thurmond A; Goldstein S
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215 Suppl():973-80. PubMed ID: 11037525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer aided detection system for micro calcifications in digital mammograms.
    Mohamed H; Mabrouk MS; Sharawy A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24909786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contamination artifact that mimics in-situ carcinoma on contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Gluskin J; Click M; Fleischman R; Dromain C; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():147-154. PubMed ID: 28987661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [X-ray mammography : calcifications, masses and architectural distortions].
    Fischer U
    Radiologe; 2008 Aug; 48(8):785-97, quiz 798. PubMed ID: 18612624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Practical application of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography [CE-MRM] by an algorithm combining morphological and enhancement patterns.
    Potente G; Messineo D; Maggi C; Savelli S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19095407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How Does the Display Luminance Level Affect Detectability of Breast Microcalcifications and Spiculated Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Images?
    Ferranti C; Primolevo A; Cartia F; Cavatorta C; Ciniselli CM; Lualdi M; Meroni S; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Scaperrotta G
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 28189505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammogram (2DSM) and conventional full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) for evaluation of breast cancer.
    Choi G; Woo OH; Shin HS; Jang S; Cho KR; Seo BK
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():170-174. PubMed ID: 28334617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adjunctive Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging for Detecting Cancer in Women with Calcifications at Mammography.
    Chung HW; So Y; Yang JH; Park KS; Yoo YB; Choi N; Kim MY; Kim J; Lee EJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 24(12):3541-3548. PubMed ID: 28819909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrast-enhanced mammography in the evaluation of breast calcifications: preliminary experience.
    Depretto C; Borelli A; Liguori A; Presti G; Vingiani A; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
    Tumori; 2020 Dec; 106(6):491-496. PubMed ID: 32515663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.