232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30679604)
1. Effects of the long-term storage of human fecal microbiota samples collected in RNAlater.
Tap J; Cools-Portier S; Pavan S; Druesne A; Öhman L; Törnblom H; Simren M; Derrien M
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):601. PubMed ID: 30679604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.
Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R
Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.
Chiu O; Gomez DE; Obrego D; Dunfield K; MacNicol JL; Liversidge B; Verbrugghe A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0292731. PubMed ID: 38285680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample storage conditions induce post-collection biases in microbiome profiles.
Jenkins SV; Vang KB; Gies A; Griffin RJ; Jun SR; Nookaew I; Dings RPM
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):227. PubMed ID: 30591021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fecal microbiome composition and diversity of cryopreserved canine stool at different duration and storage conditions.
Barko P; Nguyen-Edquilang J; Williams DA; Gal A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0294730. PubMed ID: 38324560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage.
Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of sampling and storage on the fecal microbiota composition in healthy and diseased subjects.
Tedjo DI; Jonkers DM; Savelkoul PH; Masclee AA; van Best N; Pierik MJ; Penders J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126685. PubMed ID: 26024217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of the fecal microbiota using high-throughput sequencing reveals a stable microbial community during storage.
Carroll IM; Ringel-Kulka T; Siddle JP; Klaenhammer TR; Ringel Y
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46953. PubMed ID: 23071673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fecal and oral collection methods for studies of the human microbiota in two Iranian cohorts.
Wu Z; Hullings AG; Ghanbari R; Etemadi A; Wan Y; Zhu B; Poustchi H; Fahraji BB; Sakhvidi MJZ; Shi J; Knight R; Malekzadeh R; Sinha R; Vogtmann E
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 34809575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiota Studies in Bangladesh.
Vogtmann E; Chen J; Kibriya MG; Chen Y; Islam T; Eunes M; Ahmed A; Naher J; Rahman A; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Ahsan H; Sinha R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 May; 83(10):. PubMed ID: 28258145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in Microbiota Profiles After Prolonged Frozen Storage of Stool Suspensions.
Dorsaz S; Charretier Y; Girard M; Gaïa N; Leo S; Schrenzel J; Harbarth S; Huttner B; Lazarevic V
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():77. PubMed ID: 32185143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples.
Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variations in the microbiome due to storage preservatives are not large enough to obscure variations due to factors such as host population, host species, body site, and captivity.
Asangba AE; Donohue ME; Lamb A; Wright PC; Halajian A; Leigh SR; Stumpf RM
Am J Primatol; 2019 Oct; 81(10-11):e23045. PubMed ID: 31471974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
