These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30680253)

  • 1. EMG Pattern Recognition Control of the DEKA Arm: Impact on User Ratings of Satisfaction and Usability.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M; Latlief G; Phillips S
    IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2019; 7():2100113. PubMed ID: 30680253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EMG pattern recognition compared to foot control of the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Borgia M; Cancio J; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204854. PubMed ID: 30335781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. User experience of controlling the DEKA Arm with EMG pattern recognition.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203987. PubMed ID: 30240420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of satisfaction, usability and desirability of the DEKA Arm before and after a trial of home use.
    Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Acluche F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178640. PubMed ID: 28575025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. User ratings of prosthetic usability and satisfaction in VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 24805890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control.
    Resnik L; Huang HH; Winslow A; Crouch DL; Zhang F; Wolk N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):23. PubMed ID: 29544501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series.
    Resnik L; Fantini C; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N; Sepulveda E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178642. PubMed ID: 28628623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do the outcomes of the DEKA Arm compare to conventional prostheses?
    Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Acluche F; Cancio JM; Latlief G; Sasson N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191326. PubMed ID: 29342217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User and clinician perspectives on DEKA arm: results of VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 24805891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The DEKA Arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):492-504. PubMed ID: 24150930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of retention and attrition in a study of an advanced upper limb prosthesis: implications for adoption of the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Cancio J; Klinger S; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 28375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive Characteristics Associated With Device Adoption, Skill Retention, and Early Withdrawal From a Study of an Advanced Upper Limb Prosthesis.
    Lafo J; Correia S; Borgia M; Acluche F; Resnik L
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 98(10):879-887. PubMed ID: 31135465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the DEKA Arm substitute for or supplement conventional prostheses.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):534-543. PubMed ID: 28905665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IMU-Based Wrist Rotation Control of a Transradial Myoelectric Prosthesis.
    Bennett DA; Goldfarb M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Feb; 26(2):419-427. PubMed ID: 28320673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 25019659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The DEKA hand: A multifunction prosthetic terminal device-patterns of grip usage at home.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 28914583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series.
    Resnik L; Klinger S; Gill A; Ekerholm Biester S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29741966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A real-time, practical sensor fault-tolerant module for robust EMG pattern recognition.
    Zhang X; Huang H
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 12():18. PubMed ID: 25888946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.