These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3068061)

  • 21. Testing the performance of ECG computer programs: the CSE diagnostic pilot study.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Graham I; van Herpen G; Macfarlane PW
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():73-7. PubMed ID: 3694105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. CSE Working Party.
    Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Degani R; Macfarlane PW; Zywietz C
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 2233372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
    Milliken JA; Pipberger H; Pipberger HV; Araoye MA; Ari R; Burggraf GW; Fletcher RD; Katz RJ; Lopez EA; McCans JL; Silver AM
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Computer-assisted ECG evaluation in polyclinic patients].
    Koenig W; Witzleb EJ; Khatibnia U
    Fortschr Med; 1981 Jun; 99(24):934-6. PubMed ID: 7021376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CSE database: extended annotations and new recommendations for ECG software testing.
    Smíšek R; Maršánová L; Němcová A; Vítek M; Kozumplík J; Nováková M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Aug; 55(8):1473-1482. PubMed ID: 28040865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical usefulness of computer diagnosis in automated electrocardiography.
    Endou K; Miyahara H; Sato T
    Cardiology; 1980; 66(3):174-89. PubMed ID: 6996814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B; Gjesdal K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of the performance of electrocardiographic computer programs with the use of a reference data base.
    Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Bourdillon PJ; Brohet C; Dalla Volta S; Andersen JD; Degani R; Denis B; Demeester M
    Circulation; 1985 Mar; 71(3):523-34. PubMed ID: 3838268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computerized electrocardiographic interpretation: an analysis of clinical utility in 5110 electrocardiograms.
    Thomson A; Mitchell S; Harris PJ
    Med J Aust; 1989 Oct; 151(8):428-30. PubMed ID: 2593957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The concepts of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in evaluation of electrocardiographic, vectorcardiographic and polarcardiographic criteria.
    Rautaharju PM; Blackburn HW; Warren JW
    J Electrocardiol; 1976; 9(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 781162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.
    Wathen JE; Rewers AB; Yetman AT; Schaffer MS
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography.
    Willems JL
    J Med Eng Technol; 1985; 9(5):209-17. PubMed ID: 4045988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computerized serial comparison of electrocardiograms: program performance in myocardial infarction.
    Ariet M; Zhou S; DeLuca DC; Greenfield JC
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 17118395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG.
    Gregg RE; Deluca DC; Chien CH; Helfenbein ED; Ariet M
    J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 22995382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The Caceres-USPHS (version HP-3) computer program. Evaluation of automatic analysis of 40,000 ECG (author's transl)].
    Feruglio GA; Feraco E; Maisano G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):262-71. PubMed ID: 1102374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproducibility of diagnostic results by a multivariate computer ECG analysis program (AVA 3.5).
    Willems JL; Pardaens J
    Eur J Cardiol; 1977; 6(3):229-43. PubMed ID: 338306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated electrocardiogram analysis: the state of the art.
    Bessette F; Nguyen L
    Med Inform (Lond); 1989; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 2657271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of noise on wave boundary recognition by ECG measurement programs. Recommendations for preprocessing.
    Willems JL; Zywietz C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Degani R; Macfarlane PW
    Comput Biomed Res; 1987 Dec; 20(6):543-62. PubMed ID: 3319381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.