These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30681170)
21. Comparison among Intense Pulsed Light, Alexandrite, and Long-Pulsed Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet 1064 Nm Lasers for Lower Leg Hair Removal: Case Series. Sari IW; Kurniawati Y; Diba S Int J Trichology; 2023; 15(5):197-203. PubMed ID: 39170086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology. Town G; Ash C; Dierickx C; Fritz K; Bjerring P; Haedersdal M J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):799-811. PubMed ID: 22211702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of hair removal efficacy and side effect of neodymium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and intense pulsed light systems (18-month follow-up). Szima GZ; Janka EA; Kovács A; Bortély B; Bodnár E; Sawhney I; Szabó É; Remenyik É J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 16(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 28164458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy and safety of a 0.65 millisecond pulsed portable ND:YAG laser for hair removal. Khatri KA; Lee RA; Goldberg LJ; Khatri B; Garcia V J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2009 Mar; 11(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19199118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is It Possible for Light-Based Hair Removal Home Devices to Induce Ocular Damage? Systematic Review. Al Muqarrab FJ; Alsuwaidan S; Al Muqarrab Z; Alajlan A Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 2023; 16():3731-3742. PubMed ID: 38152153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A split-face comparison of facial hair removal with the long-pulsed alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light system. Al-Dhalimi MA; Kadhum MJ J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(5):267-72. PubMed ID: 25803567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of long-pulsed diode and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers for hair removal: a long-term clinical and histologic study. Handrick C; Alster TS Dermatol Surg; 2001 Jul; 27(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 11442611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative study on a single treatment response to long pulse Nd:YAG lasers and intense pulse light therapy for hair removal on skin type IV to VI--is longer wavelengths lasers preferred over shorter wavelengths lights for assisted hair removal. Goh CL J Dermatolog Treat; 2003 Dec; 14(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 14660273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women. Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of intense pulsed light treatment on human skin in vitro: analysis of immediate effects on dermal papillae and hair follicle stem cells. Larouche D; Kim DH; Ratté G; Beaumont C; Germain L Br J Dermatol; 2013 Oct; 169(4):859-68. PubMed ID: 23796167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hair removal using a new intense pulsed light source in Chinese patients. Feng YM; Zhou ZC; Gold MH J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2009 Jun; 11(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 19337941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pneumatic skin flattening (PSF): a novel technology for marked pain reduction in hair removal with high energy density lasers and IPLs. Lask G; Friedman D; Elman M; Fournier N; Shavit R; Slatkine M J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2006 Jun; 8(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16766485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laser and light therapy for pediatric hair removal: a systematic review. Sharon E; Levi A; Lapidoth M; Snast I Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Jul; 38(1):156. PubMed ID: 37402025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hair Removal With Blended 755/1064 nm Laser Energy. Ross EV; Domankevitz Y Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Oct; 53(8):1020-1025. PubMed ID: 33508141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A review of available laser and intense light source home devices: A dermatologist's perspective. Juhász ML; Levin MK; Marmur ES J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 16(4):438-443. PubMed ID: 28741866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laser hair removal: a review and report on the use of the long-pulsed alexandrite laser for hair reduction of the upper lip, leg, back, and bikini region. McDaniel DH; Lord J; Ash K; Newman J; Zukowski M Dermatol Surg; 1999 Jun; 25(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 10469087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative assessment of growing hair counts, thickness and colour during and after treatments with a low-fluence, home-device laser: a randomized controlled trial. Thaysen-Petersen D; Barbet-Pfeilsticker M; Beerwerth F; Nash JF; Philipsen PA; Staubach P; Haedersdal M Br J Dermatol; 2015 Jan; 172(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 25039260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A review of hand-held, home-use cosmetic laser and light devices. Hession MT; Markova A; Graber EM Dermatol Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 25705949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the effect of diode laser versus intense pulsed light in axillary hair removal. Ormiga P; Ishida CE; Boechat A; Ramos-E-Silva M Dermatol Surg; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1061-9. PubMed ID: 25229781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]