These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30681405)

  • 1. Osmotic pressure estimation using the Pitzer equation for forward osmosis modelling.
    Khraisheh M; Dawas N; Nasser MS; Al-Marri MJ; Hussien MA; Adham S; McKay G
    Environ Technol; 2020 Aug; 41(19):2533-2545. PubMed ID: 30681405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental study of a 4040 spiral-wound forward-osmosis membrane module.
    Kim YC; Park SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(18):7737-45. PubMed ID: 21842852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ferric and cobaltous hydroacid complexes for forward osmosis (FO) processes.
    Ge Q; Fu F; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2014 Jul; 58():230-8. PubMed ID: 24768702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon.
    Lay WC; Chong TH; Tang CY; Fane AG; Zhang J; Liu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 20182071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scale-up of osmotic membrane bioreactors by modeling salt accumulation and draw solution dilution using hollow-fiber membrane characteristics and operation conditions.
    Kim S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():88-95. PubMed ID: 24746768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploration of an innovative draw solution for a forward osmosis-membrane distillation desalination process.
    Nguyen NC; Chen SS; Jain S; Nguyen HT; Ray SS; Ngo HH; Guo W; Lam NT; Duong HC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(6):5203-5211. PubMed ID: 28527139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental studies and modeling on concentration polarization in forward osmosis.
    Qin JJ; Chen S; Oo MH; Kekre KA; Cornelissen ER; Ruiken CJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(11):2897-904. PubMed ID: 20489263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes.
    Coday BD; Heil DM; Xu P; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(5):2386-93. PubMed ID: 23363015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Highly efficient forward osmosis based on porous membranes--applications and implications.
    Qi S; Li Y; Zhao Y; Li W; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(7):4690-5. PubMed ID: 25751713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthesis and Application of Organic Phosphonate Salts as Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis for Oil-Water Separation.
    Long Q; Shen L; Chen R; Huang J; Xiong S; Wang Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 50(21):12022-12029. PubMed ID: 27689510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparation and assessment of carboxylate polyelectrolyte as draw solute for forward osmosis.
    Cui H; Zhang H; Jiang W; Yang F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(6):5752-5761. PubMed ID: 29230651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of greywater by forward osmosis technology: role of the operating temperature.
    Wang C; Li Y; Wang Y
    Environ Technol; 2019 Nov; 40(26):3434-3443. PubMed ID: 29757084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of a nanofibrous composite membrane to the fertilizer-driven forward osmosis process for irrigation water use.
    An HK; Lee CG; Park SJ
    Environ Technol; 2017 Nov; 38(21):2700-2708. PubMed ID: 27973983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electro-Forward Osmosis.
    Son M; Kim T; Yang W; Gorski CA; Logan BE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jul; 53(14):8352-8361. PubMed ID: 31267728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Desalination of brackish water by gelatin-coated magnetite nanoparticles as a novel draw solute in forward osmosis process.
    Azadi F; Karimi-Jashni A; Zerafat MM
    Environ Technol; 2021 Jul; 42(18):2885-2895. PubMed ID: 31950874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply.
    Klaysom C; Cath TY; Depuydt T; Vankelecom IF
    Chem Soc Rev; 2013 Aug; 42(16):6959-89. PubMed ID: 23778699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting Water Flux in Forward Osmosis with Unknown Feed Solution Composition: An Empirical Approach Based on Thermodynamical Properties.
    Greisner B; Mauer D; Rögener F; Lerch A
    Membranes (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37103854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process.
    Lee J; Kim B; Hong S
    J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Jun; 26(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25079847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biofouling in forward osmosis systems: An experimental and numerical study.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; Vrouwenvelder JS; Picioreanu C
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():86-97. PubMed ID: 27697688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of pretreatment and membrane orientation on fluxes for concentration of whey with high foulants by using NH
    Seker M; Buyuksari E; Topcu S; Babaoglu DS; Celebi D; Keskinler B; Aydiner C
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 243():237-246. PubMed ID: 28672186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.