253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30681520)
1. Measurement of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Diabetes Mellitus Using the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST.
Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
Cornea; 2019 May; 38(5):595-599. PubMed ID: 30681520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of diabetes mellitus on Corvis ST measurement process.
Pérez-Rico C; Gutiérrez-Ortíz C; González-Mesa A; Zandueta AM; Moreno-Salgueiro A; Germain F
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 93(3):e193-8. PubMed ID: 25270375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular pressure measurements in diabetes mellitus.
Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1432-1439. PubMed ID: 31779470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors Influencing Corneal Biomechanics in Diabetes Mellitus.
Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
Cornea; 2020 May; 39(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 32044826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.
Huseynova T; Waring GO; Roberts C; Krueger RR; Tomita M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 157(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 24388837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Yekta AA; Danesh Z; Reisdorf S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari HR; Sadeghi J
J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability, reproducibility, and age dependency of dynamic Scheimpflug-based pneumotonometer and its correlation with a dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry device.
Bak-Nielsen S; Pedersen IB; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
Cornea; 2015 Jan; 34(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25393092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.
Pedersen IB; Bak-Nielsen S; Vestergaard AH; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 252(8):1329-35. PubMed ID: 24862302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the Corneal Thickness Profile Altered in Diabetes Mellitus?
Ramm L; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Oct; 45(10):1228-1234. PubMed ID: 32180465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Patients With Thyroid Eye Disease Using Ocular Response Analyzer.
Moghimi S; Safizadeh M; Mazloumi M; Hosseini H; Vahedian Z; Rajabi MT
J Glaucoma; 2016 Mar; 25(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 26020688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of age and gender on corneal biomechanical properties in a healthy Italian population.
Strobbe E; Cellini M; Barbaresi U; Campos EC
Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):968-72. PubMed ID: 25014149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal biomechanical parameters during pregnancy.
Sen E; Onaran Y; Nalcacioglu-Yuksekkaya P; Elgin U; Ozturk F
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 24170521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of cornea in patients with acromegaly.
Altinkaynak H; Duru N; Ersoy R; Kalkan Akcay E; Ugurlu N; Cagil N; Cakir B
Cornea; 2015 Jan; 34(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25379870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea.
Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Rasko A; Morad Y; Harstein M; Avni I; Zadok D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):715-9. PubMed ID: 19304094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus.
Kara N; Altinkaynak H; Baz O; Goker Y
Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 22677642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.
Fujishiro T; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Murata H; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jun; 29(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 32134829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters.
Rosa N; Lanza M; De Bernardo M; Signoriello G; Chiodini P
Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 24506466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
