173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30682013)
1. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?
Chuard PJC; Vrtílek M; Head ML; Jennions MD
PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000127. PubMed ID: 30682013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The distribution of P-values in medical research articles suggested selective reporting associated with statistical significance.
Perneger TV; Combescure C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():70-77. PubMed ID: 28400294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. P-Hacking in Orthopaedic Literature: A Twist to the Tail.
Bin Abd Razak HR; Ang JE; Attal H; Howe TS; Allen JC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):e91. PubMed ID: 27869632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A survey of publication bias within evolutionary ecology.
Cassey P; Ewen JG; Blackburn TM; Møller AP
Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S451-4. PubMed ID: 15801601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to design a pre-specified statistical analysis approach to limit p-hacking in clinical trials: the Pre-SPEC framework.
Kahan BC; Forbes G; Cro S
BMC Med; 2020 Sep; 18(1):253. PubMed ID: 32892743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.
Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):534-47. PubMed ID: 23855496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The distribution of probability values in medical abstracts: an observational study.
Ginsel B; Aggarwal A; Xuan W; Harris I
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Nov; 8():721. PubMed ID: 26608725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. P-Curve Analysis of the Köhler Motivation Gain Effect in Exercise Settings: A Demonstration of a Novel Technique to Estimate Evidential Value Across Multiple Studies.
Hill CR; Samendinger S; Rymal AM
Ann Behav Med; 2021 Jun; 55(6):543-556. PubMed ID: 33031538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Duyx B; Urlings MJE; Swaen GMH; Bouter LM; Zeegers MP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():92-101. PubMed ID: 28603008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results.
Malički M; Marušić A;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1103-10. PubMed ID: 25034197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
Friese M; Frankenbach J
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015).
Simonsohn U; Simmons JP; Nelson LD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Dec; 144(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 26595842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modelling publication bias and p-hacking.
Moss J; De Bin R
Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 34510407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
Schneck A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing publication bias in meta-analysis.
Soeken KL; Sripusanapan A
Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 12552177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
