These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30682013)

  • 41. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.
    Boutron I; Dutton S; Ravaud P; Altman DG
    JAMA; 2010 May; 303(20):2058-64. PubMed ID: 20501928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Orthopedic Literature in Medical Journals-Is It Negatively Biased?
    Delanois RE; Gwam CU; Piuzzi NS; Chughtai M; Malkani AL; Bonutti PM; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):615-619. PubMed ID: 28993088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
    Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
    JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Editorial: Sweet nothings - the value of negative findings for scientific progress.
    Oldehinkel AJT
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2018 Aug; 59(8):829-830. PubMed ID: 29992597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is selective reporting of clinical research unethical as well as unscientific?
    Cleophas RC; Cleophas TJ
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1999 Jan; 37(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10027477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. What you see depends on where you're looking and how you look at it: publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
    Howland RH
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2011 Aug; 49(8):13-5. PubMed ID: 21766733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
    Schimmack U
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):551-66. PubMed ID: 22924598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
    Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
    Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research.
    Bruns SB; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149144. PubMed ID: 26886098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.
    Wayant C; Scheckel C; Hicks C; Nissen T; Leduc L; Som M; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178379. PubMed ID: 28570573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
    Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice.
    Farrar BG; Ostojić L; Clayton NS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256607. PubMed ID: 34464406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Publication bias in situ.
    Phillips CV
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Aug; 4():20. PubMed ID: 15296515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Publication bias and research on passive smoking: comparison of published and unpublished studies.
    Misakian AL; Bero LA
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 9676672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board.
    Hall R; de Antueno C; Webber A;
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 May; 54(5):380-8. PubMed ID: 17470890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results.
    Mlinarić A; Horvat M; Šupak Smolčić V
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Oct; 27(3):030201. PubMed ID: 29180912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.