These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30682024)

  • 1. Activity painting: PET images of freely defined activity distributions applying a novel phantom technique.
    Forgacs A; Kallos-Balogh P; Nagy F; Krizsan AK; Garai I; Tron L; Dahlbom M; Balkay L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0207658. PubMed ID: 30682024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of realistic PET simulations incorporating tumor patient's specificity using anthropomorphic models: creation of an oncology database.
    Papadimitroulas P; Loudos G; Le Maitre A; Hatt M; Tixier F; Efthimiou N; Nikiforidis GC; Visvikis D; Kagadis GC
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112506. PubMed ID: 24320465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.
    Doot RK; Scheuermann JS; Christian PE; Karp JS; Kinahan PE
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6035-46. PubMed ID: 21158315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Target definition of moving lung tumors in positron emission tomography: correlation of optimal activity concentration thresholds with object size, motion extent, and source-to-background ratio.
    Riegel AC; Bucci MK; Mawlawi OR; Johnson V; Ahmad M; Sun X; Luo D; Chandler AG; Pan T
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1742-52. PubMed ID: 20443495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of phantom design and material-dependence on repeatability and reproducibility of CT-based radiomics features.
    Li Y; Reyhan M; Zhang Y; Wang X; Zhou J; Zhang Y; Yue NJ; Nie K
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1648-1659. PubMed ID: 35103332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.
    Panetta JV; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Karp JS
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3534-3544. PubMed ID: 28464372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A data-driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time-of-flight weighted positron emission particle tracking.
    Tumpa TR; Acuff SN; Gregor J; Lee S; Hu D; Osborne DR
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1131-1143. PubMed ID: 33226647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
    Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of errors caused by X-ray scatter and use of contrast medium when using CT-based attenuation correction in PET.
    Ay MR; Zaidi H
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Nov; 33(11):1301-13. PubMed ID: 16622710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
    Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
    Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of quantitative, efficient image reconstruction for VersaPET, a compact PET system.
    Wei S; Vaska P
    Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2852-2868. PubMed ID: 32219853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate Monte Carlo modeling and performance assessment of the X-PET subsystem of the FLEX triumph preclinical PET/CT scanner.
    Zeraatkar N; Ay MR; Kamali-Asl AR; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21520834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of motion on tracer activity determination in CT attenuation corrected PET images: a lung phantom study.
    Pevsner A; Nehmeh SA; Humm JL; Mageras GS; Erdi YE
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2358-62. PubMed ID: 16121593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.
    DiFilippo FP; Price JP; Kelsch DN; Muzic RF
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 15191308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
    Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.
    Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of multiple-interaction photon events in a high-resolution PET system that uses 3-D positioning detectors.
    Gu Y; Pratx G; Lau FW; Levin CS
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5494-508. PubMed ID: 21089785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative radiomics: Validating image textural features for oncological PET in lung cancer.
    Yang F; Young LA; Johnson PB
    Radiother Oncol; 2018 Nov; 129(2):209-217. PubMed ID: 30279049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding Changes in Tumor Texture Indices in PET: A Comparison Between Visual Assessment and Index Values in Simulated and Patient Data.
    Orlhac F; Nioche C; Soussan M; Buvat I
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Mar; 58(3):387-392. PubMed ID: 27754906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.