174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30682192)
1. Social dominance orientation as an obstacle to intergroup apology.
Mifune N; Inamasu K; Kohama S; Ohtsubo Y; Tago A
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211379. PubMed ID: 30682192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Social Dominance Orientation Predicts Opposition to Hierarchy-Attenuating Intergroup Apologies.
Karunaratne K; Laham SM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1651-1665. PubMed ID: 30975023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings.
Kleppestø TH; Czajkowski NO; Vassend O; Røysamb E; Eftedal NH; Sheehy-Skeffington J; Kunst JR; Thomsen L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Sep; 116(36):17741-17746. PubMed ID: 31431527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting community opposition to inclusion in schools: the role of social dominance, contact, intergroup anxiety, and economic conservatism.
Crowson HM; Brandes JA
J Psychol; 2010; 144(2):121-44. PubMed ID: 20307019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Social dominance orientation: revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes.
Ho AK; Sidanius J; Pratto F; Levin S; Thomsen L; Kteily N; Sheehy-Skeffington J
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 May; 38(5):583-606. PubMed ID: 22215697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions.
Guimond S; Dambrun M; Michinov N; Duarte S
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Apr; 84(4):697-721. PubMed ID: 12703644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The balanced ideological antipathy model: explaining the effects of ideological attitudes on inter-group antipathy across the political spectrum.
Crawford JT; Mallinas SR; Furman BJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1607-22. PubMed ID: 26377669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptions of immigrants: modifying the attitudes of individuals higher in social dominance orientation.
Danso HA; Sedlovskaya A; Suanda SH
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1113-23. PubMed ID: 17483398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intergroup Contact Effects via Ingroup Distancing among Majority and Minority Groups: Moderation by Social Dominance Orientation.
Kauff M; Schmid K; Lolliot S; Al Ramiah A; Hewstone M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146895. PubMed ID: 26751203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.
Ho AK; Sidanius J; Kteily N; Sheehy-Skeffington J; Pratto F; Henkel KE; Foels R; Stewart AL
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Dec; 109(6):1003-28. PubMed ID: 26479362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intergroup contact, social dominance, and environmental concern: A test of the cognitive-liberalization hypothesis.
Meleady R; Crisp RJ; Dhont K; Hopthrow T; Turner RN
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Jun; 118(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31120291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linking parental socialization about discrimination to intergroup attitudes: The role of social dominance orientation and cultural identification.
Su JC; Gries PH; Lee IC; Tran AGTT
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2017 Jul; 23(3):435-444. PubMed ID: 28125241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitudes toward group-based inequality: social dominance or social identity?
Schmitt MT; Branscombe NR; Kappen DM
Br J Soc Psychol; 2003 Jun; 42(Pt 2):161-86. PubMed ID: 12869240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.
Duckitt J
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 32(5):684-96. PubMed ID: 16702160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Social dominance orientation, belief in a just world and intergroup contact as predictors of homeless stigmatisation.
Smith R; Stathi S
J Soc Psychol; 2022 Nov; 162(6):770-780. PubMed ID: 34779352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different meanings of the social dominance orientation concept: predicting political attitudes over time.
Jetten J; Iyer A
Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Jun; 49(Pt 2):385-404. PubMed ID: 19397844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Personality traits are directly associated with anti-black prejudice in the United States.
Lin C; Alvarez RM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235436. PubMed ID: 32609765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Classical and Modern Prejudice toward Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: The Role of Experienced Contact, Beliefs in a Just World and Social Dominance Orientation.
Servidio R; Cammarata IG; Scaffidi Abbate C; Boca S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2024 Mar; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 38541354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Homophobia in physical education and sport: the role of physical/sporting identity and attributes, authoritarian aggression, and social dominance orientation.
O'Brien KS; Shovelton H; Latner JD
Int J Psychol; 2013; 48(5):891-9. PubMed ID: 22938152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The benefit of contact for prejudice-prone individuals: The type of stigmatized outgroup matters.
Maunder RD; Day SC; White FA
J Soc Psychol; 2020; 160(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 30995889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
