201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30682410)
1. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Future: Here and Now.
Rosemurgy A; Ross S; Bourdeau T; Craigg D; Spence J; Alvior J; Sucandy I
J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Apr; 228(4):613-624. PubMed ID: 30682410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 100 Robotic Distal Pancreatectomies: The Future at Hand.
Rosemurgy AS; Luberice K; Krill E; Castro M; Espineira GR; Sucandy I; Ross S
Am Surg; 2020 Aug; 86(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 32779475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicted versus observed 30-day perioperative outcomes using the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
Blair BM; Lehman EB; Jafri SM; Kaag MG; Raman JD
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 29868938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Analysis of NSQIP National Outcomes and Projected Outcomes versus Our Institutional Outcomes for Robotic Gastrectomy: The Future of Gastric Resection.
Ross SB; Slavin M; Sucandy I; Crespo KL; Syblis CC; Saravanan S; Rosemurgy AS
Am Surg; 2023 Sep; 89(9):3757-3763. PubMed ID: 37217206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rates of Serious Complications Estimated by the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Predicting Oncologic Outcomes of Patients Treated with Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer.
Choi M; Kang CM; Chong JU; Hwang HK; Yoon DS; Lee WJ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(6):1180-1187. PubMed ID: 30465189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator in Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.
Dave A; Beal EW; Lopez-Aguiar AG; Poultsides G; Makris E; Rocha FG; Kanji Z; Ronnekleiv-Kelly S; Rendell VR; Fields RC; Krasnick BA; Idrees K; Smith PM; Nathan H; Beems M; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM; Schmidt CR; Dillhoff ME
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Nov; 23(11):2225-2231. PubMed ID: 30941685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive Power of the NSQIP Risk Calculator for Early Post-Operative Outcomes After Whipple: Experience from a Regional Center in Northern Ontario.
Jiang HY; Kohtakangas EL; Asai K; Shum JB
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2018 Sep; 49(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 28462447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis.
Nassour I; Wang SC; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Augustine MM; Polanco PM; Mansour JC; Minter RM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Nov; 21(11):1784-1792. PubMed ID: 28819886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Weighing the outcomes: the role of BMI in complex robotic esophageal and hepatobiliary operations.
Rayman S; Ross SB; Sucandy I; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
Updates Surg; 2024 Jun; 76(3):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 38460102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting Complications Following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy with the ACS NSQIP
Winoker JS; Paulucci DJ; Anastos H; Waingankar N; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Sfakianos JP; Badani KK
J Urol; 2017 Oct; 198(4):803-809. PubMed ID: 28400189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of observed to predicted outcomes using the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Mogal HD; Fino N; Clark C; Shen P
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 114(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 27436166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporation of Procedure-specific Risk Into the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator Improves the Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality After Pancreatoduodenectomy.
McMillan MT; Allegrini V; Asbun HJ; Ball CG; Bassi C; Beane JD; Behrman SW; Berger AC; Bloomston M; Callery MP; Christein JD; Dickson E; Dixon E; Drebin JA; Fernandez-Del Castillo C; Fisher WE; Fong ZV; Haverick E; Hollis RH; House MG; Hughes SJ; Jamieson NB; Kent TS; Kowalsky SJ; Kunstman JW; Malleo G; McElhany AL; Salem RR; Soares KC; Sprys MH; Valero V; Watkins AA; Wolfgang CL; Zureikat AH; Vollmer CM
Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):978-986. PubMed ID: 27232260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting Postoperative Complications for Acute Care Surgery Patients Using the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.
Burgess JR; Smith B; Britt R; Weireter L; Polk T
Am Surg; 2017 Jul; 83(7):733-738. PubMed ID: 28738944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive validity of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator in geriatric patients undergoing lumbar surgery.
Wang X; Hu Y; Zhao B; Su Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Oct; 96(43):e8416. PubMed ID: 29069040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive performance of the American College of Surgeons universal risk calculator in neurosurgical patients.
Vaziri S; Wilson J; Abbatematteo J; Kubilis P; Chakraborty S; Kshitij K; Hoh DJ
J Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 128(3):942-947. PubMed ID: 28452615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review.
Doula C; Kostakis ID; Damaskos C; Machairas N; Vardakostas DV; Feretis T; Felekouras E
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Feb; 26(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 26836625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors and outcomes of converted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.
Hester CA; Nassour I; Christie A; Augustine MM; Mansour JC; Polanco PM; Porembka MR; Shoultz TH; Wang SC; Yopp AC; Zeh HJ; Minter RM
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):544-550. PubMed ID: 31016458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Surgical Site Infection in Procedure-Targeted ACS NSQIP Pancreaticoduodenectomies.
McCracken EKE; Mureebe L; Blazer DG
J Surg Res; 2019 Jan; 233():183-191. PubMed ID: 30502246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the American College of Surgeons NSQIP surgical risk calculator identify patients at risk of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction?
O'Neill AC; Bagher S; Barandun M; Hofer SO; Zhong T
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Oct; 69(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 27325513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. National Pancreatic Fistula Rates after Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP Analysis.
Panni RZ; Guerra J; Hawkins WG; Hall BL; Asbun HJ; Sanford DE
J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Aug; 229(2):192-199.e1. PubMed ID: 30797082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
