470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30682600)
1. Screening capacity and cost-effectiveness of the human papillomavirus test versus cervicography as an adjunctive test to Pap cytology to detect high-grade cervical dysplasia.
Song T; Seong SJ; Lee SK; Kim BR; Ju W; Kim KH; Nam K; Sim JC; Kim TJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():112-116. PubMed ID: 30682600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Searching for an ideal cervical cancer screening model to reduce false-negative errors in a country with high prevalence of cervical cancer.
Song T; Seong SJ; Lee SK; Kim BR; Ju W; Kim KH; Nam K; Sim JC; Kim TJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):240-246. PubMed ID: 31340702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing PAP smear cytology, aided visual inspection, screening colposcopy, cervicography and HPV testing as optional screening tools in Latin America. Study design and baseline data of the LAMS study.
Syrjänen K; Naud P; Derchain S; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Hammes LS; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian L; Braganca J; Arlindo FC; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(5):3469-80. PubMed ID: 16101165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Previous Papanicolaou and Hybrid Capture 2 human papillomavirus testing results of 5699 women with histologically diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3.
Wu T; Chen X; Zheng B; Li J; Xie F; Ding X; Zeng Z; Zhao C
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 31272603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of single-, double- and triple-combined testing, including Pap test, HPV DNA test and cervicography, as screening methods for the detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Kim JH; Kim IW; Kim YW; Park DC; Kim YW; Lee KH; Ahn TG; Han SJ; Ahn WS
Oncol Rep; 2013 Apr; 29(4):1645-51. PubMed ID: 23443346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance characteristics of Pap test, VIA, VILI, HR-HPV testing, cervicography, and colposcopy in diagnosis of significant cervical pathology.
Longatto-Filho A; Naud P; Derchain SF; Roteli-Martins C; Tatti S; Hammes LS; Sarian LO; Eržen M; Branca M; de Matos JC; Gontijo R; Maeda MY; Lima T; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Virchows Arch; 2012 Jun; 460(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 22562132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ogilvie GS; van Niekerk D; Krajden M; Smith LW; Cook D; Gondara L; Ceballos K; Quinlan D; Lee M; Martin RE; Gentile L; Peacock S; Stuart GCE; Franco EL; Coldman AJ
JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29971397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and methods of the evaluation of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Mexico: The Morelos HPV Study.
Flores Y; Shah K; Lazcano E; Hernández M; Bishai D; Ferris DG; Lörincz A; Hernández P; Salmerón J;
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 12216521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjunctive human papillomavirus testing in the 2-year follow-up of women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial and economic evaluation.
Lytwyn A; Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Daya D; Chapman W; Howard M; Roth P; Lorincz AT; Gafni A; Walter SD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Sep; 127(9):1169-75. PubMed ID: 12946228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HPV testing with cytology triage for cervical cancer screening in routine practice.
Louvanto K; Chevarie-Davis M; Ramanakumar AV; Franco EL; Ferenczy A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):474.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24373948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjunctive human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option in some clinical settings for disease risk assessment and triage of females with ASC-H Papanicolaou test results.
Bandyopadhyay S; Austin RM; Dabbs D; Zhao C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 132(12):1874-81. PubMed ID: 19061283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer.
Costa S; Sideri M; Syrjänen K; Terzano P; De Nuzzo M; De Simone P; Cristiani P; Finarelli AC; Bovicelli A; Zamparelli A; Bovicelli L
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 10833984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HPV detection rates and histopathologic follow-up of patients with HSIL cytology in a large academic women's hospital laboratory.
Ashman D; Zhang H; Li J; Austin M; Wang T; Pradhan D; Zhao C
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):550-555. PubMed ID: 32475726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
