These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30682671)

  • 1. Economic costs of using tailwater recovery systems for maintaining water quality and irrigation.
    Omer AR; Henderson JE; Falconer L; Krӧger R; Allen PJ
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Apr; 235():186-193. PubMed ID: 30682671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agricultural irrigation of vine crops from desalinated and brackish groundwater under an economic perspective. A case study in Siġġiewi, Malta.
    Aparicio J; Tenza-Abril AJ; Borg M; Galea J; Candela L
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 1):734-740. PubMed ID: 30212704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement and modeling of phosphorous transport in shallow groundwater environments.
    Hendricks GS; Shukla S; Obreza TA; Harris WG
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Aug; 164():125-37. PubMed ID: 24981965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental Nitrogen Losses from Commercial Crop Production Systems in the Suwannee River Basin of Florida.
    Prasad R; Hochmuth GJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167558. PubMed ID: 27907130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of pollutant reduction system for controlling agricultural non-point-source pollution based on grey relational analysis combined with analytic hierarchy process.
    Sun X; Hu Z; Li M; Liu L; Xie Z; Li S; Wang G; Liu F
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():370-380. PubMed ID: 31103682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Spatially Targeted Conservation to Evaluate Nitrogen Reduction and Economic Opportunities for Best Management Practice Placement in Agricultural Landscapes.
    Zimmerman EK; Tyndall JC; Schulte LA
    Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):313-328. PubMed ID: 31367774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A generic approach to evaluate costs and effectiveness of agricultural Beneficial Management Practices to improve water quality management.
    Zammali MK; Hassanzadeh E; Shupena-Soulodre E; Lindenschmidt KE
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112336. PubMed ID: 33740750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of groundwater suitability for irrigation in the Skhirat region, Northwest of Morocco.
    Zouahri A; Dakak H; Douaik A; El Khadir M; Moussadek R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jan; 187(1):4184. PubMed ID: 25467415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A GIS policy approach for assessing the effect of fertilizers on the quality of drinking and irrigation water and wellhead protection zones (Crete, Greece).
    Kourgialas NN; Karatzas GP; Koubouris GC
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 189():150-159. PubMed ID: 28013089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing surface water pollution through the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of BMPs at different spatial scales.
    Panagopoulos Y; Makropoulos C; Mimikou M
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2823-35. PubMed ID: 21742430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management Practices Used in Agricultural Drainage Ditches to Reduce Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia.
    Faust DR; Kröger R; Moore MT; Rush SA
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 100(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 29238843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The greenhouse gas cost of agricultural intensification with groundwater irrigation in a Midwest U.S. row cropping system.
    McGill BM; Hamilton SK; Millar N; Robertson GP
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Dec; 24(12):5948-5960. PubMed ID: 30295393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydrochemical characteristics and quality assessment of groundwater for irrigation use in central and eastern Songnen Plain, Northeast China.
    Bian J; Nie S; Wang R; Wan H; Liu C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jun; 190(7):382. PubMed ID: 29881889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond the nutrient strategies: Common ground to accelerate agricultural water quality improvement in the upper Midwest.
    Christianson R; Christianson L; Wong C; Helmers M; McIsaac G; Mulla D; McDonald M
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():1072-1080. PubMed ID: 30029341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying efficient agricultural irrigation strategies in Crete.
    Udias A; Pastori M; Malago A; Vigiak O; Nikolaidis NP; Bouraoui F
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Aug; 633():271-284. PubMed ID: 29574371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Landscape irrigation management for maintaining an aquifer and economic returns.
    Kovacs KF; Mancini M; West G
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 160():271-82. PubMed ID: 26144558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of production practices on physicochemical properties of rice grain quality.
    Bryant RJ; Anders M; McClung A
    J Sci Food Agric; 2012 Feb; 92(3):564-9. PubMed ID: 25363646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Water-quality analysis of an intensively used on-farm storage reservoir in the northeast Arkansas delta.
    Moore MT; Pierce JR; Farris JL
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2015 Jul; 69(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25912809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wastewater irrigation and environmental health: implications for water governance and public policy.
    Hanjra MA; Blackwell J; Carr G; Zhang F; Jackson TM
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2012 Apr; 215(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 22093903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating agricultural best management practices in tile-drained subwatersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois.
    Lemke AM; Kirkham KG; Lindenbaum TT; Herbert ME; Tear TH; Perry WL; Herkert JR
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1215-28. PubMed ID: 21712591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.