338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30682749)
1. Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors.
Sayahi T; Butterfield A; Kelly KE
Environ Pollut; 2019 Feb; 245():932-940. PubMed ID: 30682749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor.
Kelly KE; Whitaker J; Petty A; Widmer C; Dybwad A; Sleeth D; Martin R; Butterfield A
Environ Pollut; 2017 Feb; 221():491-500. PubMed ID: 28012666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors.
DeWitt HL; Crow WL; Flowers B
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):292-306. PubMed ID: 31961265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the correlations of ambient tapered element oscillating microbalance PM2.5 data and SHARP 5030 Federal Equivalent Method in Ontario: a multiple linear regression analysis.
Sofowote U; Su Y; Bitzos MM; Munoz A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jan; 64(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 24620408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term field characterization of tapered element oscillating microbalance and modified tapered element oscillating microbalance samplers in urban and rural New York State locations.
Schwab JJ; Spicer J; Demerjian KL; Ambs JL; Felton HD
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Oct; 54(10):1264-80. PubMed ID: 15540579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.
Zusman M; Schumacher CS; Gassett AJ; Spalt EW; Austin E; Larson TV; Carvlin G; Seto E; Kaufman JD; Sheppard L
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105329. PubMed ID: 31783241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collocated comparisons of continuous and filter-based PM2.5 measurements at Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada.
Hsu YM; Wang X; Chow JC; Watson JG; Percy KE
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 26727574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Field evaluation of particulate matter measurements using tapered element oscillating microbalance in a layer house.
Li QF; Wang-Li L; Liu Z; Heber AJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Mar; 62(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 22482290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile.
Tagle M; Rojas F; Reyes F; Vásquez Y; Hallgren F; Lindén J; Kolev D; Watne ÅK; Oyola P
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Feb; 192(3):171. PubMed ID: 32040639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuous determination of fine particulate matter mass in the Salt Lake City Environmental Monitoring project: a comparison of real-time and conventional TEOM monitor results.
Long RW; Eatough NL; Eatough DJ; Meyer MB; Wilson WE
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Dec; 55(12):1839-46. PubMed ID: 16408688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas.
Allen G; Sioutas C; Koutrakis P; Reiss R; Lurmann FW; Roberts PT
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1997 Jun; 47(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 9180064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and evaluation of a portable PM
Tryner J; Quinn C; Windom BC; Volckens J
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Aug; 21(8):1403-1415. PubMed ID: 31389929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring.
Liu X; Jayaratne R; Thai P; Kuhn T; Zing I; Christensen B; Lamont R; Dunbabin M; Zhu S; Gao J; Wainwright D; Neale D; Kan R; Kirkwood J; Morawska L
Environ Res; 2020 Jun; 185():109438. PubMed ID: 32276167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors.
Sayahi T; Kaufman D; Becnel T; Kaur K; Butterfield AE; Collingwood S; Zhang Y; Gaillardon PE; Kelly KE
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113131. PubMed ID: 31521992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and comparison of continuous fine particulate matter monitors for measurement of ambient aerosols.
Zhu K; Zhang J; Lioy PJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Dec; 57(12):1499-506. PubMed ID: 18200935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semicontinuous PM2.5 and PM10 mass and composition measurements in Lindon, Utah, during winter 2007.
Hansen JC; Woolwine WR; Bates BL; Clark JM; Kuprov RY; Mukherjee P; Murray JA; Simmons MA; Waite MF; Eatough NL; Eatough DJ; Long R; Grover BD
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Mar; 60(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 20397564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of background particulate matter concentrations in small cities and rural locations--Prince George, Canada.
Veira A; Jackson PL; Ainslie B; Fudge D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):773-87. PubMed ID: 23926847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air.
Han I; Symanski E; Stock TH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 27690287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor.
Levy Zamora M; Xiong F; Gentner D; Kerkez B; Kohrman-Glaser J; Koehler K
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 53(2):838-849. PubMed ID: 30563344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjusting tapered element oscillating microbalance data for comparison with Federal Reference Method PM2.5 measurements in region 5.
Rizzo M; Scheff PA; Kaldy W
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 May; 53(5):596-607. PubMed ID: 12774993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
