These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30685283)

  • 1. Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Cvetanovich GL; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Nwachukwu BU; Cabarcas BC; Cole BJ; Forsythe B; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 May; 28(5):939-948. PubMed ID: 30685283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
    Manderle BJ; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Beletsky A; Nwachukwu BU; Nicholson GP; Bush-Joseph C; Romeo AA; Forsythe B; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Dec; 48(14):3447-3453. PubMed ID: 33079576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
    Kim DM; Kim TH; Kholinne E; Park JH; Shin MJ; Kim H; Park D; Jeon IH; Koh KH
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Sep; 48(11):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 32813985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.
    Scanaliato JP; Green CK; Sandler AB; Hurley ET; Hettrich CM; Parnes N
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jan; 52(1):207-214. PubMed ID: 38164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis.
    Puzzitiello RN; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Agarwalla A; Verma NN; Forsythe B
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Apr; 28(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 30713060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair.
    Haunschild ED; Gilat R; Fu MC; Tauro T; Huddleston HP; Yanke AB; Forsythe B; Verma NN; Cole BJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Dec; 48(14):3439-3446. PubMed ID: 33104397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Zeng GJ; Moorthy V; Hao Y; Tjoen Lie DT
    J ISAKOS; 2024 Aug; 9(4):592-597. PubMed ID: 38740267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes Following Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Allograft.
    Evuarherhe A; Condron NB; Gilat R; Knapik DM; Patel S; Wagner KR; Garrigues GE; Romeo A; Verma N; Cole BJ
    Arthroscopy; 2022 May; 38(5):1444-1453.e1. PubMed ID: 34863902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction.
    Yeom JW; Kim DM; Lee JB; Ben H; Alahmadi BM; Park JH; Koh KH; Jeon IH
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Oct; 50(12):3308-3317. PubMed ID: 36041050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?
    Werner BC; Chang B; Nguyen JT; Dines DM; Gulotta LV
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2672-2681. PubMed ID: 27392769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty.
    Gowd AK; Charles MD; Liu JN; Lalehzarian SP; Cabarcas BC; Manderle BJ; Nicholson GP; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Nov; 28(11):2238-2246. PubMed ID: 31307894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of age and gender in rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state 2 years after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction.
    Ben H; Yeom JW; Kholinne E; Guo J; Park JY; Ryu SM; Koh KH; Jeon IH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2024 Apr; 32(4):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 38477103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following failed superior capsular reconstruction.
    Cusano A; Kanski G; Uyeki C; Adams K; Cote MP; Muench LN; Connors JP; Garvin P; Messina JC; Berthold DP; Kissenberth MJ; Mazzocca AD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1426-1435. PubMed ID: 35122950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) correlates with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Wickman JR; Lau BC; Scribani MB; Wittstein JR
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Feb; 29(2):363-369. PubMed ID: 31542324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores correlate positively with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores postoperatively in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
    Retzky JS; Baker M; Hannan CV; Srikumaran U
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):146-149. PubMed ID: 31401127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mental health status, not resilience, influences functional recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.
    Hines AC; Pill SG; Boes N; Reuschel B; Lutz A; Thigpen CA; Shanley E; Kissenberth MJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6S):S117-S122. PubMed ID: 35288297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Is Maximum Outcome Improvement Defined in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy for Rotator Cuff Repair? A 1-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Beck EC; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Waterman BR; Nicholson KF; Forsythe B; Yanke AB; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jul; 36(7):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 32201303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction.
    Khan AZ; Vaughan AK; Aman ZS; Lazarus MD; Williams GR; Namdari S
    J Clin Med; 2024 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 38731077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability of MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds in Studies Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review.
    Lee AC; Gupta R; Kelly JD; Li X; Parisien RL
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jul; 52(9):2424-2432. PubMed ID: 38318661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimal clinically important differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale pain scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Tashjian RZ; Shin J; Broschinsky K; Yeh CC; Martin B; Chalmers PN; Greis PE; Burks RT; Zhang Y
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1406-1411. PubMed ID: 32081634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.