These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30685504)

  • 1. Event-related brain potentials to self-triggered tones: Impact of action type and impulsivity traits.
    Le Bars S; Darriba Á; Waszak F
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():14-22. PubMed ID: 30685504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit agency in observed actions: evidence for N1 suppression of tones caused by self-made and observed actions.
    Poonian SK; McFadyen J; Ogden J; Cunnington R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 27(4):752-64. PubMed ID: 25321488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological alterations in motor-auditory predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder.
    van Laarhoven T; Stekelenburg JJ; Eussen MLJM; Vroomen J
    Autism Res; 2019 Apr; 12(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 30801964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consequences matter: Self-induced tones are used as feedback to optimize tone-eliciting actions.
    Neszmélyi B; Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):904-915. PubMed ID: 28240775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Violation of identity-specific action-effect prediction increases pupil size and attenuates auditory event-related potentials at P2 latencies when action-effects are behaviorally relevant.
    Lindner E; Desantis A; Cheng FP; Gail A
    Neuroimage; 2024 Aug; 297():120717. PubMed ID: 38971482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attenuation of auditory N2 for self-modulated tones during continuous actions.
    Sugimoto F; Kimura M; Takeda Y
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Nov; 166():108201. PubMed ID: 34653547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fifty Percent of the Time, Tones Come Every Time: Stronger Prediction Error Effects on Neurophysiological Sensory Attenuation for Self-generated Tones.
    Egan S; Seidel A; Weber C; Ghio M; Bellebaum C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Oct; 36(10):2067-2083. PubMed ID: 39023362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-initiation and temporal cueing of monaural tones reduce the auditory N1 and P2.
    Sowman PF; Kuusik A; Johnson BW
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):149-57. PubMed ID: 22885999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of mechanical impact in action-related auditory attenuation.
    Horváth J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 14(4):1392-406. PubMed ID: 24723005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory Attenuation of the Auditory P2 Differentiates Self- from Partner-Produced Sounds during Joint Action.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 33(11):2297-2310. PubMed ID: 34272962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action Intention-based and Stimulus Regularity-based Predictions: Same or Different?
    Korka B; Schröger E; Widmann A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1917-1932. PubMed ID: 31393234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attenuation of auditory evoked potentials for hand and eye-initiated sounds.
    Mifsud NG; Beesley T; Watson TL; Whitford TJ
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():61-68. PubMed ID: 27592269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From spatial acoustic changes to attentive behavioral responses within 200 ms in humans.
    Ruusuvirta T
    Neurosci Lett; 1999 Nov; 275(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 10554982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect anticipation modulates deviance processing in the brain.
    Waszak F; Herwig A
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1183():74-82. PubMed ID: 17927968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones.
    Woods DL; Elmasian R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Nov; 65(6):447-59. PubMed ID: 2429824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.
    Escera C; Alho K; Winkler I; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Sep; 10(5):590-604. PubMed ID: 9802992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory N1 and P2 attenuation in action observation: An event-related potential study considering effects of temporal predictability and individualism.
    Egan S; Ghio M; Bellebaum C
    Biol Psychol; 2023 May; 180():108575. PubMed ID: 37156324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive coding of visual-auditory and motor-auditory events: An electrophysiological study.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():88-96. PubMed ID: 25641042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.