194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30685511)
1. Electroencephalographic assessment of pneumatically powered penetrating and non-penetrating captive-bolt stunning of bulls.
Gibson TJ; Oliveira SEO; Costa FAD; Gregory NG
Meat Sci; 2019 May; 151():54-59. PubMed ID: 30685511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of pneumatically powered penetrating and non-penetrating captive bolts in stunning cattle.
Oliveira SEO; Gregory NG; Dalla Costa FA; Gibson TJ; Dalla Costa OA; Paranhos da Costa MJR
Meat Sci; 2018 Jun; 140():9-13. PubMed ID: 29477880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun.
Oliveira SEO; Gregory NG; Dalla Costa FA; Gibson TJ; Paranhos da Costa MJR
Meat Sci; 2017 Aug; 130():64-68. PubMed ID: 28433852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods.
Neves JE; Paranhos da Costa MJ; Roça RO; Faucitano L; Gregory NG
Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():41-3. PubMed ID: 26946474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electroencephalographic assessment of concussive non-penetrative captive bolt stunning of turkeys.
Gibson TJ; Rebelo CB; Gowers TA; Chancellor NM
Br Poult Sci; 2018 Feb; 59(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 29099622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of brain damage resulting from penetrating and non-penetrating stunning in Nelore Cattle using pneumatically powered captive bolt guns.
Oliveira SEO; Dalla Costa FA; Gibson TJ; Costa OAD; Coldebella A; Gregory NG
Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():347-351. PubMed ID: 30029088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of the occurrence of incorrect stunning and the occurrence of reflexes and reactions in cattle after pneumatically powered captive-bolt stunning in comparison with cartridge-fired captive-bolt stunning.
Kaluza M; Vecerek V; Voslarova E; Kamenik J; Konvalinova J; Valkova L; Takacova D
Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13728. PubMed ID: 35470517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of indicators used to assess unconsciousness in veal calves at slaughter.
Verhoeven MT; Gerritzen MA; Hellebrekers LJ; Kemp B
Animal; 2016 Sep; 10(9):1457-65. PubMed ID: 26965337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cattle stunning with a penetrative captive bolt device: A review.
Kamenik J; Paral V; Pyszko M; Voslarova E
Anim Sci J; 2019 Mar; 90(3):307-316. PubMed ID: 30669179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of captive bolt gun length on brain trauma and post-stunning hind limb activity in finished cattle Bos taurus.
Kline HC; Wagner DR; Edwards-Callaway LN; Alexander LR; Grandin T
Meat Sci; 2019 Sep; 155():69-73. PubMed ID: 31082781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of nonpenetrating captive bolt stunning followed by electrical induction of cardiac arrest in veal calves.
Bartz B; Collins M; Stoddard G; Appleton A; Livingood R; Sobcynski H; Vogel KD
J Anim Sci; 2015 Sep; 93(9):4557-63. PubMed ID: 26440354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review.
Verhoeven MT; Gerritzen MA; Hellebrekers LJ; Kemp B
Animal; 2015 Feb; 9(2):320-30. PubMed ID: 25354537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of the shooting position on the stunning of calves by captive bolt.
Lambooy E; Spanjaard W
Vet Rec; 1981 Oct; 109(16):359-61. PubMed ID: 7324352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants.
Grandin T
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 Nov; 221(9):1258-61. PubMed ID: 12418689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of a newly designed double-barreled bullet-shooting stunner for adequate stunning of water buffaloes.
Gascho D; Stephan R; Bauer C; Oesch MA; Richter H
Meat Sci; 2022 Nov; 193():108933. PubMed ID: 35961127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a microwave stunning system for cattle 2: Preliminary observations on behavioural responses and EEG.
Small A; Lea J; Niemeyer D; Hughes J; McLean D; McLean J; Ralph J
Res Vet Sci; 2019 Feb; 122():72-80. PubMed ID: 30468879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a pneumatically operated captive bolt for stunning/killing broiler chickens.
Raj AB; O'Callaghan M
Br Poult Sci; 2001 Jul; 42(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11469546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning - a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions.
Fries R; Schrohe K; Lotz F; Arndt G
Animal; 2012 Jul; 6(7):1124-8. PubMed ID: 23031473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The occurrence of reflexes and reactions in cattle following stunning with a captive bolt at the slaughterhouse.
Vecerek V; Kamenik J; Voslarova E; Vecerkova L; Machovcova Z; Volfova M; Konvalinova J
Anim Sci J; 2020; 91(1):e13373. PubMed ID: 32301197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation Into the Humaneness of Slaughter Methods for Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcelus) in the Andean Region.
Limon G; Gonzales-Gustavson EA; Gibson TJ
J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2016; 19(3):280-93. PubMed ID: 26963642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
