These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30685514)

  • 1. Hand function, not proximity, biases visuotactile integration later in object processing: An ERP study.
    Vyas DB; Garza JP; Reed CL
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Mar; 69():26-35. PubMed ID: 30685514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feeling but not seeing the hand: Occluded hand position reduces the hand proximity effect in ERPs.
    Reed CL; Garza JP; Vyas DB
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Sep; 64():154-163. PubMed ID: 29735213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional effects of hand proximity occur later in older adults: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Reed CL; Clay SN; Kramer AO; Leland DS; Hartley AA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Dec; 32(8):710-721. PubMed ID: 29239656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Touched" by light: event-related potentials (ERPs) to visuo-haptic stimuli in peri-personal space.
    Simon-Dack SL; Cummings SE; Reetz DJ; Alvarez-Vazquez E; Gu H; Teder-Sälejärvi WA
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):261-8. PubMed ID: 19404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regularity of approaching visual stimuli influences spatial expectations for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.
    Kimura T; Katayama J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 28271219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical EEG components that reflect inverse effectiveness during visuotactile integration processing.
    Kanayama N; Kimura K; Hiraki K
    Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 1598():18-30. PubMed ID: 25514335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The approach of visual stimuli influences expectations about stimulus types for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.
    Kimura T; Katayama J
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1563-1571. PubMed ID: 29572648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention.
    Merz S; Jensen A; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 31343245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the motor system contribute to the perception of changes in objects visual attributes? The neural dynamics of sensory binding by action.
    Wamain Y; Corveleyn X; Ott L; Coello Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107121. PubMed ID: 31199954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased Neural Strength and Reliability to Audiovisual Stimuli at the Boundary of Peripersonal Space.
    Noel JP; Serino A; Wallace MT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 31(8):1155-1172. PubMed ID: 30188779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The N2cc component as an electrophysiological marker of space-based and feature-based attentional target selection processes in touch.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13391. PubMed ID: 31066917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rubber hand presentation modulates visuotactile interference effect especially in persons with high autistic traits.
    Wada M; Ide M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 26358127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Action preparation modulates sensory perception in unseen personal space: An electrophysiological investigation.
    Job XE; de Fockert JW; van Velzen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():445-452. PubMed ID: 27450265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency tagging of steady-state evoked potentials to explore the crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
    Colon E; Legrain V; Huang G; Mouraux A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1498-510. PubMed ID: 26329531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Independent effects of eye gaze and spatial attention on the processing of tactile events: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109():239-47. PubMed ID: 26101088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of perceptual load on tactile spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Berreby F
    Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 1673():42-51. PubMed ID: 28803830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visuospatial sequence learning on the serial reaction time task modulates the P1 event-related potential.
    Lum JAG; Lammertink I; Clark GM; Fuelscher I; Hyde C; Enticott PG; Ullman MT
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Feb; 56(2):e13292. PubMed ID: 30246295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impaired conflict monitoring near the hands: Neurophysiological evidence.
    Wang X; Du F; Hopfinger JB; Zhang K
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Oct; 138():41-47. PubMed ID: 30121288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial attention affects the processing of tactile and visual stimuli presented at the tip of a tool: an event-related potential study.
    Yue Z; Bischof GN; Zhou X; Spence C; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 193(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 18936924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.