These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3068595)

  • 1. The effect of selective suture removal on astigmatism following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Burk LL; Waring GO; Radjee B; Stulting RD
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1988 Dec; 19(12):849-54. PubMed ID: 3068595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two selective interrupted suture removal techniques for control of post keratoplasty astigmatism.
    Forster RK
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1997; 95():193-214; discussion 214-20. PubMed ID: 9440170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined interrupted and continuous versus single continuous adjustable suturing in penetrating keratoplasty: a prospective, randomized study of induced astigmatism during the first postoperative year.
    Karabatsas CH; Cook SD; Figueiredo FC; Diamond JP; Easty DL
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):1991-8. PubMed ID: 9818595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous and sequential selective suture removal to reduce astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Burk LL; Waring GO; Harris DJ
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1990; 6(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 2248925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of a single continuous nylon suture for control of post keratoplasty astigmatism.
    Van Meter W
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1996; 94():1157-80. PubMed ID: 8981721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal.
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Küchle M; Naumann GO
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Nov; 110(11):2162-7. PubMed ID: 14597524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suturing technique for control of postkeratoplasty astigmatism and myopia.
    Dursun D; Forster RK; Feuer WJ
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2002; 100():51-7; discussion 57-9. PubMed ID: 12545677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complications of Mersilene sutures in penetrating keratoplasty.
    Bertram BA; Drews-Botsch C; Gemmill M; Guell J; Murad M; Waring GO
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1992; 8(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 1390410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shortterm and longterm visual and astigmatic results of an opposing 10-0 nylon double running suture technique for penetrating keratoplasty.
    Dolorico AM; Tayyani R; Ong HV; Gaster RN
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Dec; 197(6):991-9. PubMed ID: 14644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in keratometric astigmatism after suture removal more than one year after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Mader TH; Yuan R; Lynn MJ; Stulting RD; Wilson LA; Waring GO
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Jan; 100(1):119-26; discussion 127. PubMed ID: 8433816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topographic changes that occur with 10-0 running suture removal following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Lin DT; Wilson SE; Reidy JJ; Klyce SD; McDonald MB; Insler MS; Kaufman HE
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1990; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 2248900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refractive results of successful penetrating keratoplasty, intraocular lens implantation with selective suture removal.
    Pradera I; Ibrahim O; Waring GO
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1989; 5(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 2488811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refractive and keratometric results after the triple procedure: experience with early and late suture removal.
    Davis EA; Azar DT; Jakobs FM; Stark WJ
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Apr; 105(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 9544635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effect of three suturing techniques on postkeratoplasty astigmatism in keratoconus.
    Javadi MA; Naderi M; Zare M; Jenaban A; Rabei HM; Anissian A
    Cornea; 2006 Oct; 25(9):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17133048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Keratometric results during the first year after keratoplasty: adjustable single running suture technique versus double running suture technique.
    Ramirez M; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2001; 32(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 11563780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The unsolved problem of transplant astigmatism].
    Bigar F; Uffer S
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 May; 200(5):401-3. PubMed ID: 1535401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different suturing techniques variously affect the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.
    Busin M; Mönks T; al-Nawaiseh I
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Jul; 105(7):1200-5. PubMed ID: 9663222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term results of single continuous suture adjustment to reduce penetrating keratoplasty astigmatism.
    McNeill JI; Aaen VJ
    Cornea; 1999 Jan; 18(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 9894932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Refractive versus keratometric astigmatism postkeratoplasty.
    Judge D; Gordon L; Vander Zwaag R; Wood TO
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1990; 6(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 2248924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in corneal power and refraction due to sequential suture removal following nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus.
    Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 141(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 16458682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.