258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30686063)
1. Motivators and barriers to using information and communication technology in everyday life following stroke: a qualitative and video observation study.
Lemke M; Rodríguez Ramírez E; Robinson B; Signal N
Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Jul; 42(14):1954-1962. PubMed ID: 30686063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Smartphone accessibility: understanding the lived experience of users with cervical spinal cord injuries.
Armstrong-Wood R; Messiou C; Kite A; Joyce E; Panousis S; Campbell H; Lauriau A; Manning J; Carlson T
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1434-1445. PubMed ID: 37010939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experiences of using information and communication technology within the first year after stroke - a grounded theory study.
Gustavsson M; Ytterberg C; Nabsen Marwaa M; Tham K; Guidetti S
Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 40(5):561-568. PubMed ID: 27976926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study.
Demain S; Burridge J; Ellis-Hill C; Hughes AM; Yardley L; Tedesco-Triccas L; Swain I
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Aug; 13():334. PubMed ID: 23968362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "The fact that I can be in front of others, I am used to being a bit behind": how assistive activity technology affects participation in everyday life.
Pedersen H; Söderström S; Kermit PS
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 31411518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experiences of using mobile phones in everyday life among persons with stroke and their families in Uganda - a qualitative study.
Kamwesiga JT; Tham K; Guidetti S
Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 39(5):438-449. PubMed ID: 26939597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attitudes faced by young adults using assistive technology as depicted through photovoice.
Ripat J; Woodgate RL; Bennett L
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 30776928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. 'I think writing is everything': An exploration of the writing experiences of people with aphasia.
Thiel L; Conroy P
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Nov; 57(6):1381-1398. PubMed ID: 35929726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significant others' perspectives on person-centred information and communication technology in stroke rehabilitation - a grounded theory study.
Marwaa MN; Ytterberg C; Guidetti S
Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Jul; 42(15):2115-2122. PubMed ID: 30648452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. I've got a mobile phone too! Hard and soft assistive technology customization and supportive call centres for people with disability.
Darcy S; Green J; Maxwell H
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 May; 12(4):341-351. PubMed ID: 27293107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technology to encourage meaningful activities following brain injury.
Jamieson M; Jack R; O'Neill B; Cullen B; Lennon M; Brewster S; Evans J
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 May; 15(4):453-466. PubMed ID: 30985193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities.
Hammel J; Magasi S; Heinemann A; Gray DB; Stark S; Kisala P; Carlozzi NE; Tulsky D; Garcia SF; Hahn EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4):578-88. PubMed ID: 25813890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lifeworld perspectives utilizing assistive devices: individuals, lived experience following a stroke.
Pettersson I; Appelros P; Ahlström G
Can J Occup Ther; 2007 Feb; 74(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 17319319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Information communication technology-enabled instrumental activities of daily living: a paradigm shift in functional assessment.
Quamar AH; Schmeler MR; Collins DM; Schein RM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Oct; 15(7):746-753. PubMed ID: 31418601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional activities and social participation after stroke in rural China: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.
Zhang L; Yan T; You L; Gao Y; Li K; Zhang C
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 32(2):273-283. PubMed ID: 28776407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring stroke survivor experience of participation in an enriched environment: a qualitative study.
White JH; Bartley E; Janssen H; Jordan LA; Spratt N
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(7):593-600. PubMed ID: 25754445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor's perspective.
White J; Janssen H; Jordan L; Pollack M
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(13):1186-92. PubMed ID: 25212736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive invention: independence and mobility through modifications.
Mairami FF; Allotey P; Warren N; Mak JS; Reidpath DD
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Oct; 13(7):658-664. PubMed ID: 28836873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stroke survivors' experiences with home-based telerehabilitation using an assistive device to improve upper limb function: a qualitative study.
Spits AH; Rozevink SG; Balk GA; Hijmans JM; van der Sluis CK
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):730-738. PubMed ID: 36137223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lifeworld perspectives on assistive devices: lived experiences of spouses of persons with stroke.
Pettersson I; Berndtsson I; Appelros P; Ahlström G
Scand J Occup Ther; 2005 Dec; 12(4):159-69. PubMed ID: 16457089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
