These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30686710)

  • 1. Production tolerance of conventional and digital workflow in the manufacturing of glass ceramic crowns.
    Mahmood DJH; Braian M; Larsson C; Wennerberg A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):486-494. PubMed ID: 30686710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials.
    Azarbal A; Azarbal M; Engelmeier RL; Kunkel TC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 29143397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit Accuracy of Pressed and Milled Lithium Disilicate Inlays Fabricated From Conventional Impressions or a Laboratory-Based Digital Workflow.
    Homsy F; Bottin M; Özcan M; Majzoub Z
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 30779496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
    Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microstructure, topography, surface roughness, fractal dimension, internal and marginal adaptation of pressed and milled lithium-disilicate monolithic restorations.
    Schestatsky R; Zucuni CP; Dapieve KS; Burgo TAL; Spazzin AO; Bacchi A; Valandro LF; Pereira GKR
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Jan; 64(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 31213364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments.
    Taha D; Nour M; Zohdy M; El-Etreby A; Hamdy A; Salah T
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 31573716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; Li H; Xu L; Wang Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical quality and efficiency of monolithic glass ceramic crowns in the posterior area: digital compared with conventional workflows.
    Mühlemann S; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 30264050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior.
    Ottoni R; Marocho SMS; Griggs JA; Borba M
    J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104181. PubMed ID: 35679990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; Li H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 35788274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
    Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.