These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30687152)

  • 21. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.
    Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bigna JJ; Um LN; Nansseu JR
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):174. PubMed ID: 27737710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health.
    Dal-Ré R; Bobes J; Cuijpers P
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 28351418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2005; 3(6):1-33. PubMed ID: 27819973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses.
    Siddaway AP; Wood AM; Hedges LV
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():747-770. PubMed ID: 30089228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta-analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009.
    Dahabreh IJ; Chung M; Kitsios GD; Terasawa T; Raman G; Tatsioni A; Tobar A; Lau J; Trikalinos TA; Schmid CH
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 26053844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What is the quality of reporting on guideline, protocol or algorithm implementation in adult trauma centres? Protocol for a systematic review.
    Gotlib Conn L; Nathens AB; Perrier L; Haas B; Watamaniuk A; Daniel Pereira D; Zwaiman A; da Luz LT
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e021750. PubMed ID: 29743331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review.
    Tan WK; Wigley J; Shantikumar S
    Int J Surg; 2014 Dec; 12(12):1262-5. PubMed ID: 25448643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Meta-Research on Oncology Trials: A Toolkit for Researchers with Limited Resources.
    Riechelmann RP; Péron J; Seruga B; Saad ED
    Oncologist; 2018 Dec; 23(12):1467-1473. PubMed ID: 29769384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Laboratory Medicine: Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.
    Jang MA; Kim B; Lee YK
    Ann Lab Med; 2020 May; 40(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 31858765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience.
    Maticic K; Krnic Martinic M; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):32. PubMed ID: 30764774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of the abstract reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analysis: a literature survey.
    Jia PL; Xu B; Cheng JM; Huang XH; Kwong JSW; Liu Y; Zhang C; Han Y; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):148. PubMed ID: 31307388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.
    Korevaar DA; van Enst WA; Spijker R; Bossuyt PM; Hooft L
    Evid Based Med; 2014 Apr; 19(2):47-54. PubMed ID: 24368333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methodological standards in medical reporting.
    Sporbeck B; Jacobs A; Hartmann V; Nast A
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2013 Feb; 11(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 23279950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reporting quality and statistical analysis of published dose-response meta-analyses was suboptimal: a cross-sectional literature survey.
    Jiang Q; Liu Q; Chen F; Zeng X; Song F; Lu Z; Cao S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():133-140. PubMed ID: 31326542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.