These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30687204)

  • 21. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
    Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Confidence Can Be Used to Discriminate Between Accurate and Inaccurate Lie Decisions.
    Smith AM; Leach AM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Nov; 14(6):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 31539484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Some Evidence That Truth-Tellers Are More Attractive Than Liars.
    Ten Brinke L; Raymundo I; Mukherjee M; Carney DR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; ():1461672231207567. PubMed ID: 37888143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lie Detection Using fNIRS Monitoring of Inhibition-Related Brain Regions Discriminates Infrequent but not Frequent Liars.
    Li F; Zhu H; Xu J; Gao Q; Guo H; Wu S; Li X; He S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():71. PubMed ID: 29593514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.
    Bogaard G; van der Mark J; Meijer EH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226257. PubMed ID: 31825997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie.
    Farrow TF; Reilly R; Rahman TA; Herford AE; Woodruff PW; Spence SA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 14620232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Dalton G; Jo E; Shaboltas A; Khaleeva M; Granskaya J; Houston K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():44-53. PubMed ID: 28477454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.
    Vrij A; Hartwig M; Granhag PA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():295-317. PubMed ID: 30609913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deception detection: State of the art and future prospects.
    Masip J
    Psicothema; 2017 May; 29(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 28438235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cross-cultural differences in children's choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies.
    Fu G; Xu F; Cameron CA; Leyman G; Lee K
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Mar; 43(2):278-93. PubMed ID: 17352539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do liars really remember what they lied upon? The impact of fabrication on memory.
    Battista F; Mangiulli I; Riesthuis P; Curci A; Otgaar H
    Memory; 2021 Sep; 29(8):1076-1090. PubMed ID: 34339348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
    Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A within-statement baseline comparison for detecting lies.
    Verigin BL; Meijer EH; Vrij A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 34552381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does the truth come out in the writing? Scan as a lie detection tool.
    Nahari G; Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 22471387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars.
    Verigin BL; Meijer EH; Bogaard G; Vrij A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225566. PubMed ID: 31794563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. False Identity Detection Using Complex Sentences.
    Monaro M; Gamberini L; Zecchinato F; Sartori G
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():283. PubMed ID: 29559945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do True and False Intentions Differ in Level of Abstraction? A Test of Construal Level Theory in Deception Contexts.
    Calderon S; Mac Giolla E; Granhag PA; Ask K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2037. PubMed ID: 29209261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.