These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30687382)

  • 1. Genomic Selection and Use of Molecular Tools in Breeding Programs for Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle in Developing Countries: Current Status and Future Prospects.
    Mrode R; Ojango JMK; Okeyo AM; Mwacharo JM
    Front Genet; 2018; 9():694. PubMed ID: 30687382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invited review: Genomic selection for small ruminants in developed countries: how applicable for the rest of the world?
    Mrode R; Tarekegn GM; Mwacharo JM; Djikeng A
    Animal; 2018 Jul; 12(7):1333-1340. PubMed ID: 29343308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing the design of small-sized nucleus breeding programs for dairy cattle with minimal performance recording.
    Kariuki CM; Komen H; Kahi AK; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7963-74. PubMed ID: 25282422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic evaluation of progeny-testing and genomic selection schemes for small-sized nucleus dairy cattle breeding programs in developing countries.
    Kariuki CM; Brascamp EW; Komen H; Kahi AK; van Arendonk JAM
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Mar; 100(3):2258-2268. PubMed ID: 28109609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
    Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
    Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review: Genomics of bull fertility.
    Taylor JF; Schnabel RD; Sutovsky P
    Animal; 2018 Jun; 12(s1):s172-s183. PubMed ID: 29618393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of genomic selection for replacement strategies using selection index theory.
    Calus MP; Bijma P; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Sep; 98(9):6499-509. PubMed ID: 26142859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
    Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cattle.
    VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; Chud TCS; Norman HD; Megonigal JH; Haagen IW; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1620-1631. PubMed ID: 31837783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
    Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Symposium review: Single-step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle.
    Mäntysaari EA; Koivula M; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5314-5326. PubMed ID: 32331883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle.
    van den Berg I; MacLeod IM; Reich CM; Breen EJ; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6276-6298. PubMed ID: 32331891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle.
    Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; O'Brien AM; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Schenkel FS; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Cole JB; da Silva MV; Queiroz SA; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):17. PubMed ID: 24575732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.