169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30689000)
1. Age, gender, functional KSS, reason for revision and type of bone defect predict functional outcome 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty: a multivariable prediction model.
Verbeek JFM; Hannink G; Defoort KC; Wymenga AB; Heesterbeek PJC
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jul; 27(7):2289-2296. PubMed ID: 30689000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femoral joint line restoration is a major determinant of postoperative range of motion in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Han HS; Yu CH; Shin N; Won S; Lee MC
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jul; 27(7):2090-2095. PubMed ID: 30788530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modern full-component aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties have similar recoveries compared with primary total knee arthroplasty patients when applying an enhanced recovery anaesthetic and analgesic protocol.
Costales T; Chapman DM; Miller MJ; Dalury DF
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):96-100. PubMed ID: 32475271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protocol-Driven Revision for Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Motion and Clinical Outcomes.
Hug KT; Amanatullah DF; Huddleston JI; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2952-2955. PubMed ID: 29859726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision for coronal malalignment will improve functional outcome up to 5 years postoperatively.
van Laarhoven SN; Heesterbeek PJC; Teerenstra S; Wymenga AB
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Aug; 30(8):2731-2737. PubMed ID: 34028565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty following aseptic failure.
Kasmire KE; Rasouli MR; Mortazavi SM; Sharkey PF; Parvizi J
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):264-7. PubMed ID: 23159149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening].
Rozkydal Z; Janík P; Janícek P; Kunovský R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17331449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA): mid-term outcomes and bone loss/quality evaluation and treatment.
Rosso F; Cottino U; Dettoni F; Bruzzone M; Bonasia DE; Rossi R
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Aug; 14(1):280. PubMed ID: 31462273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia.
Jensen CL; Winther N; Schrøder HM; Petersen MM
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 25212989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying Risk Factors for the Development of Stiffness After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Dowdle SB; Bedard NA; Owens JM; Gao Y; Callaghan JJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1186-1188. PubMed ID: 29336857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of hospital case volume on re-revision following revision total knee arthroplasty.
Yapp LZ; Walmsley PJ; Moran M; Clarke JV; Simpson AHRW; Scott CEH
Bone Joint J; 2021 Apr; 103-B(4):602-609. PubMed ID: 33789471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Isolated revision of the polyethylene component at revision total knee arthroplasty has excellent survivorship at ten years.
Greenwell PH; Shield WP; Chapman DM; Dalury DF
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7_Supple_C):104-107. PubMed ID: 31256651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fate of the unrevised all-polyethylene patellar component in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Lonner JH; Mont MA; Sharkey PF; Siliski JM; Rajadhyaksha AD; Lotke PA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jan; 85(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 12533572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Bloomfield MR; Klika AK; Lee HH; Joyce DM; Mehta P; Barsoum WK
J Knee Surg; 2010 Mar; 23(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 20812582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of early functional outcomes in patients after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a nomogram prediction model.
Duan X; Zhao Y; Zhang J; Kong N; Cao R; Guan H; Li Y; Wang K; Yang P; Tian R
Int J Surg; 2023 Oct; 109(10):3107-3116. PubMed ID: 37352526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative Activity Level an Indicator of Postoperative Functional Outcomes with a Contemporary Revision Total Knee System.
Auran RL; Ashby SL; Hitt KD; Jacofsky DJ
J Knee Surg; 2023 Sep; 36(11):1125-1131. PubMed ID: 35817053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.
Sandiford NA; Misur P; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV; Masri BA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 27287857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty.
van Rensch PJH; Heesterbeek PJC; Hannink G; van Hellemondt GG; Wymenga AB
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1043-1048. PubMed ID: 30367195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complex Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes.
Martin JR; Beahrs TR; Stuhlman CR; Trousdale RT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):1459-70. PubMed ID: 27605690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
