BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30689609)

  • 1. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
    Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes.
    Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T
    Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Disposable Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare ic100, and Tonopen XL to Standards of Care Goldmann Nondisposable Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure.
    Wong B; Parikh D; Rosen L; Gorski M; Angelilli A; Shih C
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1119-1124. PubMed ID: 30134367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
    Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
    Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
    Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
    Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
    Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Manual Upper Eyelid Elevation on Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Four Different Tonometers.
    Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Oogi S; Shiraishi M; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Feb; 97(2):128-133. PubMed ID: 32011586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agreement and repeatability of Icare ic100 tonometer.
    Jose J; Ve RS; Pai HV; Biswas S; Parimi V; Poojary P; Nagarajan T
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 68(10):2122-2125. PubMed ID: 32971622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Salim S; Du H; Wan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification.
    Kiddee W; Tanjana A
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):317-324. PubMed ID: 33137014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
    Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
    Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of iCare ic100 tonometry with iCare TA01i in screening of unselected population in Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye study.
    Liinamaa MJ; Stoor K; Leiviskä I; Saarela V
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; ():11206721211014387. PubMed ID: 33951959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the influence of corneal properties and densitometry on applanation and rebound tonometry in primary open angle glaucoma.
    Molero-Senosiain M; Morales-Fernandez L; Saenz-Frances F; Kwan J; Garcia Feijoo J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Mar; 46(3):249-257. PubMed ID: 36739259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness.
    Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A
    Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.