These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
999 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30689898)
1. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response. Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response. Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryopreservation of in vitro matured oocytes in addition to ovarian tissue freezing for fertility preservation in paediatric female cancer patients before and after cancer therapy. Abir R; Ben-Aharon I; Garor R; Yaniv I; Ash S; Stemmer SM; Ben-Haroush A; Freud E; Kravarusic D; Sapir O; Fisch B Hum Reprod; 2016 Apr; 31(4):750-62. PubMed ID: 26848188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of stage and grade of breast cancer on fertility preservation outcome in reproductive-aged women. Volodarsky-Perel A; Cai E; Tulandi T; Son WY; Suarthana E; Buckett W Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Feb; 40(2):215-222. PubMed ID: 31953011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BRCA1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro. Grynberg M; Dagher Hayeck B; Papanikolaou EG; Sifer C; Sermondade N; Sonigo C Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 30561604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols. Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank. Hipp HS; Gaskins AJ; Nagy ZP; Capelouto SM; Shapiro DB; Spencer JB Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):847-858. PubMed ID: 32142582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature. Brouillet S; Ranisavljevic N; Sonigo C; Haquet E; Bringer-Deutsch S; Loup-Cabaniols V; Hamamah S; Willems M; Anahory T Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 37381072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol. Pujol A; Zamora MJ; Obradors A; Garcia D; Rodriguez A; Vassena R Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):989-997. PubMed ID: 31116386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles. Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ovarian response and follow-up outcomes in women diagnosed with cancer having fertility preservation: Comparison of random start and early follicular phase stimulation - cohort study. Muteshi C; Child T; Ohuma E; Fatum M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():10-14. PubMed ID: 30227359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval. Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study. Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles. Cornet-Bartolomé D; Rodriguez A; García D; Barragán M; Vassena R Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2262-2271. PubMed ID: 32856058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Morin SJ; Patounakis G; Juneau CR; Neal SA; Scott RT; Seli E Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 30010882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Live births following fertility preservation using in-vitro maturation of ovarian tissue oocytes. Segers I; Bardhi E; Mateizel I; Van Moer E; Schots R; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; De Vos M Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2026-2036. PubMed ID: 32829388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fertility preservation for women with breast cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial on various ovarian stimulation protocols. Balkenende EME; Dahhan T; Beerendonk CCM; Fleischer K; Stoop D; Bos AME; Lambalk CB; Schats R; Smeenk JMJ; Louwé LA; Cantineau AEP; de Bruin JP; Linn SC; van der Veen F; van Wely M; Goddijn M Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 35776109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]