These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30690400)

  • 21. Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.
    de Snoo GR; de Wit PJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Sep; 41(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 9756699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Environmental, bystander and resident exposure from orchard applications using an agricultural unmanned aerial spraying system.
    Dubuis PH; Droz M; Melgar A; Zürcher UA; Zarn JA; Gindro K; König SLB
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 881():163371. PubMed ID: 37044339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors affecting aerial spray drift in the Brazilian Cerrado.
    Baio FHR; Antuniassi UR; Castilho BR; Teodoro PE; Silva EED
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212289. PubMed ID: 30779797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 1: wind tunnel experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 19226819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Environmentally Optimised Sprayer (EOS)--A software application for comprehensive assessment of environmental safety features of sprayers.
    Doruchowski G; Balsari P; Gil E; Marucco P; Roettele M; Wehmann HJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 482-483():201-7. PubMed ID: 24651055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examining the role of wind in human illness due to pesticide drift in Washington state, 2000-2015.
    Kasner EJ; Prado JB; Yost MG; Fenske RA
    Environ Health; 2021 Mar; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 33722241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Drift from the Use of Hand-Held Knapsack Pesticide Sprayers in Boyacá (Colombian Andes).
    García-Santos G; Feola G; Nuyttens D; Diaz J
    J Agric Food Chem; 2016 May; 64(20):3990-8. PubMed ID: 26479088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pneumatic spray delivery-based solid set canopy delivery system for oblique banded leaf roller and codling moth control in a high-density modern apple orchard.
    Sahni RK; Ranjan R; Hoheisel GA; Khot LR; Beers EH; Grieshop MJ
    Pest Manag Sci; 2022 Nov; 78(11):4793-4801. PubMed ID: 35895013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 2: field experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):723-7. PubMed ID: 19226820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Canopy spray application technology in specialty crops: a slowly evolving landscape.
    Warneke BW; Zhu H; Pscheidt JW; Nackley LL
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 May; 77(5):2157-2164. PubMed ID: 33135282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Near-field air concentrations of pesticides in potato agriculture in Prince Edward Island.
    Garron CA; Davis KC; Ernst WR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2009 Jun; 65(6):688-96. PubMed ID: 19278022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Winds of change, developing a non-target plant bioassay employing field-based pesticide drift exposure: A case study with atrazine.
    Brain R; Goodwin G; Abi-Akar F; Lee B; Rodgers C; Flatt B; Lynn A; Kruger G; Perkins D
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 678():239-252. PubMed ID: 31075591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of natural windbreaks on drift reduction in orchard spraying.
    Wenneker M; Heijne B; van de Zande JC
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 16628943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.
    Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift: A South African ground application case study.
    Nsibande SA; Dabrowski JM; van der Walt E; Venter A; Forbes PB
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():454-61. PubMed ID: 26171732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The agricultural dispersal-valley drift spray drift modeling system compared with pesticide drift data.
    Allwine KJ; Thistle HW; Teske ME; Anhold J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 May; 21(5):1085-90. PubMed ID: 12013131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Testing flow-through air samplers for use in near-field vapour drift studies by measuring pyrimethanil in air after spraying.
    Geoghegan TS; Hageman KJ; Hewitt AJ
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Mar; 16(3):422-32. PubMed ID: 24365971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Occurrence of spray drift for different crop types: cereal, cereal stubble and grassland.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 19226823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 2. Primary drift (droplet drift).
    Carlsen SC; Spliid NH; Svensmark B
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jul; 64(5):778-86. PubMed ID: 16337986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.