These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30691214)

  • 1. Procedure for Calibrating the Z-axis of a Confocal Microscope: Application for the Evaluation of Structured Surfaces.
    Wang C; Caja J; Gómez E; Maresca P
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30691214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters.
    Song JF; Rudder FF; Vorburger TV; Smith JH
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 1995; 100(5):543-561. PubMed ID: 29151760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some Considerations about the Use of Contact and Confocal Microscopy Methods in Surface Texture Measurement.
    García JC; Sanz Lobera A; Maresca P; Pareja TF; Wang C
    Materials (Basel); 2018 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 30127320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Wavelet Packet Transform for Surface Roughness Evaluation and Texture Extraction.
    Wang X; Shi T; Liao G; Zhang Y; Hong Y; Chen K
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28441749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard Reference Specimens in Quality Control of Engineering Surfaces.
    Song JF; Vorburger TV
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 1991; 96(3):271-289. PubMed ID: 28184115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurements of the surface microroughness with the scanning electron microscope.
    Paluszyński J; Slówko W
    J Microsc; 2009 Jan; 233(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19196407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to select the most relevant 3D roughness parameters of a surface.
    Deltombe R; Kubiak KJ; Bigerelle M
    Scanning; 2014; 36(1):150-60. PubMed ID: 24038147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Procedure for Determining the Uncertainties in the Modeling of Surface Roughness in the Turning of NiTi Alloys Using the Monte Carlo Method.
    Kowalczyk M; Tomczyk K
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(19):. PubMed ID: 33003592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confocal signal evaluation algorithms for surface metrology: uncertainty and numerical efficiency.
    Rahlves M; Roth B; Reithmeier E
    Appl Opt; 2017 Jul; 56(21):5920-5926. PubMed ID: 29047912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Establishing metrological traceability for small molecule measurands in laboratory medicine.
    Seger C; Kessler A; Taibon J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Oct; 61(11):1890-1901. PubMed ID: 36622091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method development in quantitative NMR towards metrologically traceable organic certified reference materials used as (31)P qNMR standards.
    Weber M; Hellriegel C; Rueck A; Wuethrich J; Jenks P; Obkircher M
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Apr; 407(11):3115-23. PubMed ID: 25416230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a traceable calibration methodology for solid (68)Ge/(68)Ga sources used as a calibration surrogate for (18)F in radionuclide activity calibrators.
    Zimmerman BE; Cessna JT
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Mar; 51(3):448-53. PubMed ID: 20197450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo and
    Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Food surface texture measurement using reflective confocal laser scanning microscopy.
    Sheen S; Bao G; Cooke P
    J Food Sci; 2008 Jun; 73(5):E227-34. PubMed ID: 18576995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Surface Topography Feature Size Density and Distribution on the Results of a Data Processing and Parameters Calculation with a Comparison of Regular Methods.
    Podulka P
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Jul; 14(15):. PubMed ID: 34361271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of Industrial Standards for the Calibration of Optical Microscopes.
    Mínguez Martínez A; Gómez Pérez C; Pérez-Caballero DC; Carcedo Cerezo L; de Vicente Y Oliva J
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 33374680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement uncertainty associated with chromatic confocal profilometry for 3D surface texture characterization of natural human enamel.
    Mullan F; Bartlett D; Austin RS
    Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):e273-e281. PubMed ID: 28473225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a new sodium diclofenac certified reference material using the mass balance approach and ¹H qNMR to determine the certified property value.
    Nogueira R; Garrido BC; Borges RM; Silva GE; Queiroz SM; Cunha VS
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2013 Feb; 48(3):502-13. PubMed ID: 23220339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
    España S; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.