575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30691515)
1. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Hayata K; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Ojima T; Iwahashi M; Katsuda M; Tsuji T; Kato T; Kitadani J; Takeuchi A; Tabata H; Yamaue H
Surgery; 2017 Jul; 162(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 28318550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Triangulating stapling technique for esophagogastrostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Noshiro H; Urata M; Ikeda O; Iwasaki H; Nabae T; Uchiyama A; Nagai E; Tanaka M
Surgery; 2013 Sep; 154(3):604-10. PubMed ID: 23859308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi-mechanical with hand-sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE-study).
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; de Vringer T; van Lanschot JJB; Willemsen SP; Hop WCJ; Wijnhoven BPL
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(8):1616-1623. PubMed ID: 32989770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Circular Stapled Technique Versus Modified Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Higaki E; Fujieda H; Nagao T; Ito S; Komori K; Iwase M; Oze I; Shimizu Y
Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34417369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M
World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy.
Mao CY; Yang YS; Yuan Y; Hu WP; Zhao YF; Hu Y; Che GW; Chen LQ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 26(12):4062-4069. PubMed ID: 31313034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the outcomes between total eversion and conventional triangulating stapling technique in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Takahashi K; Watanabe M; Ushida Y; Kanie Y; Kozuki R; Toihata T; Otake R; Kanamori J; Okamura A; Imamura Y; Mine S
Esophagus; 2021 Jul; 18(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 33523356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The triangulating stapling technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy.
Toh Y; Sakaguchi Y; Ikeda O; Adachi E; Ohgaki K; Yamashita Y; Oki E; Minami K; Okamura T
Surg Today; 2009; 39(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19280278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
