These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30692724)

  • 1. Comparison of antegrade percutaneous versus retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy for upper ureteric calculus for stone clearance, morbidity, and complications.
    Bhat A; Singh V; Bhat M; Khandelwal N; Bhat A
    Indian J Urol; 2019; 35(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 30692724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL).
    Joshi HN; Shrestha B; Karmacharya RM; Makaju S; Koju R; Gyawali D
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2017 Oct.-Dec.; 15(60):343-346. PubMed ID: 30580354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technique, complications, and outcomes of pediatric urolithiasis management at a tertiary care hospital: evolving paradigms over the last 15 years.
    Yadav P; Madhavan K; Syal S; Farooq A; Srivastava A; Ansari MS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):665.e1-665.e7. PubMed ID: 31648889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of stone size on the results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of upper ureteric stones.
    El-Abd AS; Tawfeek AM; El-Abd SA; Gameel TA; El-Tatawy HH; El-Sabaa MA; Soliman MG
    Arab J Urol; 2022; 20(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 35223107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of antegrade and retrograde ureterolithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Taguchi K; Hamamoto S; Osaga S; Sugino T; Unno R; Ando R; Okada A; Yasui T
    Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Mar; 10(3):1179-1191. PubMed ID: 33850753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.
    Qi S; Li Y; Liu X; Zhang C; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Xu Y
    J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 24786613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
    Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotomy for large (>15 mm) impacted upper ureteral stones in different locations: is the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra a good indication for choice of management method?
    Li H; Na W; Li H; Jiang Y; Gu X; Zhang M; Huo W; Kong X
    J Endourol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1120-5. PubMed ID: 23514547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large impacted upper ureteral calculi: A comparative study between retrograde ureterolithotripsy and percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position.
    Moufid K; Abbaka N; Touiti D; Adermouch L; Amine M; Lezrek M
    Urol Ann; 2013 Jul; 5(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 24049373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Calculi: A Three-year Multicenter Experience of Simultaneous Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Ureterolithotripsy.
    Chen YC; Chen HW; Juan YS; Lo IS; Shih MP; Wu WJ; Jhan JH; Huang TY
    Urol J; 2019 Oct; 16(5):433-438. PubMed ID: 30206920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
    Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
    J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
    Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.
    Sun X; Xia S; Lu J; Liu H; Han B; Li W
    J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):913-7. PubMed ID: 18429682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study.
    Chen H; Zhu Z; Cui Y; Li Y; Chen Z; Yang Z; Zeng F
    Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Mar; 10(3):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 33850740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of lower urethral calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of effectiveness and complications.
    Zhong W; Zeng G; Cai Y; Dai Q; Hu J; Wei H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jul; 116(7):1001-3. PubMed ID: 12890371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm.
    Shao Y; Wang DW; Lu GL; Shen ZJ
    World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1841-5. PubMed ID: 25822707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
    Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Wang Y; Chang X; Li J; Han Z
    Int Braz J Urol; 2020; 46(6):902-926. PubMed ID: 32459455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: is it still a reasonable treatment option for multiple ureteric stones?
    Isen K
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 22327396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of health-related quality of life for patients after urinary lithotripsy: ureteroscopic vs. shock wave lithotripsy.
    Hamamoto S; Unno R; Taguchi K; Naiki T; Ando R; Okada A; Inoue T; Okada S; AbdelRazek M; Kohri K; Yasui T;
    Urolithiasis; 2018 Apr; 46(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 28357452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.