These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30693377)

  • 1. The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.
    Baldassari MJ; Kantner J; Lindsay DS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jan; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 30693377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.
    Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confirming feedback following a mistaken identification impairs memory for the culprit.
    Smalarz L; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 24707912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mistaken eyewitness identification rates increase when either witnessing or testing conditions get worse.
    Smith AM; Wilford MM; Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Aug; 43(4):358-368. PubMed ID: 31144829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models.
    Smith AM; Ying RC; Goldstein AR; Fitzgerald RJ
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 251():105877. PubMed ID: 39002429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
    Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups.
    Elphick C; Philpot R; Zhang M; Stuart A; Pike G; Strathie A; Havard C; Walkington Z; Frumkin LA; Levine M; Price BA; Bandara AK; Nuseibeh B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():640513. PubMed ID: 33935892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
    Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eyewitnesses' free-report verbal confidence statements are diagnostic of accuracy.
    Smalarz L; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):138-151. PubMed ID: 34110875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay.
    Wells GL; Olson EA; Charman SD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2003 Mar; 9(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 12710837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age.
    Wright DB; Stroud JN
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):641-54. PubMed ID: 12508699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help?
    Memon A; Gabbert F
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12731718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Lineup Administrators Blind to the Suspect's Identity Influence Witnesses' Decisions?
    McCallum NA; Brewer N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 31984009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.