These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30693377)
1. The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test. Baldassari MJ; Kantner J; Lindsay DS Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jan; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 30693377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects. Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model. Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups. Elphick C; Philpot R; Zhang M; Stuart A; Pike G; Strathie A; Havard C; Walkington Z; Frumkin LA; Levine M; Price BA; Bandara AK; Nuseibeh B Front Psychol; 2021; 12():640513. PubMed ID: 33935892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup. Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory. Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology. Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eyewitnesses' free-report verbal confidence statements are diagnostic of accuracy. Smalarz L; Yang Y; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):138-151. PubMed ID: 34110875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age. Wright DB; Stroud JN Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):641-54. PubMed ID: 12508699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help? Memon A; Gabbert F J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12731718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can Lineup Administrators Blind to the Suspect's Identity Influence Witnesses' Decisions? McCallum NA; Brewer N Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 31984009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]