These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array. Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Gstoettner WK; Van de Heyning P; O'Connor AF; Kiefer J; Morera C; Sainz M; Vermeire K; McDonald S; Cavallé L; Valdecasas JG; Adunka OF; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Helbig S ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 21997337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech Recognition and Subjective Hearing Abilities for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Dillon MT; Buss E; Thompson NJ; Richter ME; Davis AG; Overton AB; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Selleck AM; Dedmon MM; Brown KD Otol Neurotol; 2024 Oct; 45(9):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 39165094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C. test. Brockmeier SJ; Peterreins M; Lorens A; Vermeire K; Helbig S; Anderson I; Skarzynski H; Van de Heyning P; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():70-80. PubMed ID: 19955723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant. Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Individual Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation Using the Concept of Partial Insertion. Lenarz T; Timm ME; Salcher R; Büchner A Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e326-e335. PubMed ID: 30741914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of Electric Frequency-to-Place Mismatches on the Early Speech Recognition Outcomes for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users. Dillon MT; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Rooth MA; Richter ME; Overton AB; Roth NE; Dillon SM; Raymond JH; Young A; Pearson AC; Davis AG; Dedmon MM; Brown KD; O'Connell BP Am J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 32(1):251-260. PubMed ID: 36800505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. James C; Albegger K; Battmer R; Burdo S; Deggouj N; Deguine O; Dillier N; Gersdorff M; Laszig R; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Mondain M; Offeciers E; Macías AR; Ramsden R; Sterkers O; Von Wallenberg E; Weber B; Fraysse B Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):481-91. PubMed ID: 16092537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Short-term observation of electrical acoustic stimulation in patients with low frequency residual hearing after cochlear implant]. Wang RJ; Luo JF; Chao XH; Hu FX; Fan ZM; Xu L; Wang HB Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 58(12):1173-1182. PubMed ID: 38186091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears. Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12500. PubMed ID: 28970567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Long-term follow-up of hearing preservation in electric-acoustic stimulation patients. Mertens G; Punte AK; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1765-72. PubMed ID: 25133472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes. Pillsbury HC; Dillon MT; Buchman CA; Staecker H; Prentiss SM; Ruckenstein MJ; Bigelow DC; Telischi FF; Martinez DM; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Blevins NH; Larky JB; Alexiades G; Kaylie DM; Roland PS; Miyamoto RT; Backous DD; Warren FM; El-Kashlan HK; Slager HK; Reyes C; Racey AI; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 29342054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience. Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users. Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):868-882. PubMed ID: 31592902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation. Helbig S; Baumann U Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():81-87. PubMed ID: 19955724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Incidence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in the Functional Acoustic Hearing Region and the Influence on Speech Recognition with Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Nix EP; Thompson NJ; Brown KD; Dedmon MM; Selleck AM; Overton AB; Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT Otol Neurotol; 2023 Dec; 44(10):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 37758328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]