These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30694120)

  • 41. Effects of the Configuration of Hearing Loss on Consonant Perception between Simulated Bimodal and Electric Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
    Yoon YS; Whitaker G; Lee YS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):521-527. PubMed ID: 34965598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS).
    Wilson BS
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():56-66. PubMed ID: 21756584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation.
    Kay-Rivest E; Winchester A; McMenomey SO; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Friedmann DR
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):566-571. PubMed ID: 36534657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes with electric-acoustic stimulation after 12 months of listening experience.
    Adunka OF; Dillon MT; Adunka MC; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Oct; 123(10):2509-15. PubMed ID: 23918623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Acceptance and Benefit of Electroacoustic Stimulation in Children.
    Spitzer ER; Kay-Rivest E; Waltzman SB; O'Brien-Russo CA; Santacatterina M; Roland JT; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):453-461. PubMed ID: 37167445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Impact of Electric Stimulation on Residual Hearing.
    Dillon MT; Bucker AL; Adunka MC; King ER; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):732-740. PubMed ID: 26333881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Shifting Fundamental Frequency in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Listening: Effects of F0 Variation.
    Brown CA; Helms Tillery K; Apoux F; Doyle NM; Bacon SP
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e18-25. PubMed ID: 26565786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):22-62. PubMed ID: 33818263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.
    Dorman MF; Gifford RH; Spahr AJ; McKarns SA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 18057874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Dillon MT; O'Connell BP; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Hopfinger J
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):322-337. PubMed ID: 35394798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Identification of Pure-Tone Audiologic Thresholds for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Systematic Review.
    de Kleijn JL; van Kalmthout LWM; van der Vossen MJB; Vonck BMD; Topsakal V; Bruijnzeel H
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jul; 144(7):630-638. PubMed ID: 29800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Zhang T; Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 19915474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of Test Condition on Speech Perception With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 26650652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Electroacoustic Stimulation Rehabilitation in Children With Limited Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Nam GS; Song MH; Choi JY; Jung J
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Oct; 40(9):e894-e900. PubMed ID: 31498289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Reality of Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Who Is Utilizing EAS?
    Perkins E; Lee J; Manzoor N; O'Malley M; Bennett M; Labadie R; Rivas A; Haynes D; Gifford R
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jul; 42(6):832-837. PubMed ID: 34111047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Hearing Preservation During Cochlear Implantation and Electroacoustic Stimulation in Patients With SLC26A4 Mutations.
    Roh KJ; Park S; Jung JS; Moon IS; Kim SH; Bang MY; Choi JY
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 28796087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Körtje M; Baumann U; Stöver T; Weissgerber T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241015. PubMed ID: 33075114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Binaural interference with simulated electric acoustic stimulation.
    van Ginkel C; Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2445. PubMed ID: 31046315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.