205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30694566)
1. Interim analysis incorporating short- and long-term binary endpoints.
Niewczas J; Kunz CU; König F
Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):665-687. PubMed ID: 30694566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal futility stopping boundaries for binary endpoints.
Freitag MM; Li X; Rauch G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):80. PubMed ID: 38539108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving interim decisions in randomized trials by exploiting information on short-term endpoints and prognostic baseline covariates.
Van Lancker K; Vandebosch A; Vansteelandt S
Pharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 19(5):583-601. PubMed ID: 32248662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A flexible futility monitoring method with time-varying conditional power boundary.
Ying Zhang ; Clarke WR
Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 20423927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit.
Lachin JM
Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interim futility analysis with intermediate endpoints.
Goldman B; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18283075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive Designs with Discrete Test Statistics and Consideration of Overrunning.
Schmidt R; Burkhardt B; Faldum A
Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 26429500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating futility of a binary clinical endpoint using early read-outs.
Van Lancker K; Vandebosch A; Vansteelandt S; De Ridder F
Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5361-5375. PubMed ID: 31631357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using short-term endpoints to improve interim decision making and trial duration in two-stage phase II trials with nested binary endpoints.
Zocholl D; Kunz CU; Rauch G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Sep; 32(9):1749-1765. PubMed ID: 37489267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operating characteristics of sample size re-estimation with futility stopping based on conditional power.
Lachin JM
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3348-65. PubMed ID: 16345019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative views on setting clinical trial futility criteria.
Gallo P; Mao L; Shih VH
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(5):976-93. PubMed ID: 24933121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive clinical trial designs with blinded selection of binary composite endpoints and sample size reassessment.
Roig MB; Melis GG; Posch M; Koenig F
Biostatistics; 2023 Dec; 25(1):237-252. PubMed ID: 36150142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do we need to adjust for interim analyses in a Bayesian adaptive trial design?
Ryan EG; Brock K; Gates S; Slade D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):150. PubMed ID: 32522284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising.
Chen YH; DeMets DL; Lan KK
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1023-38. PubMed ID: 15057876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint.
Li X; Herrmann C; Rauch G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):274. PubMed ID: 33153438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice of futility boundaries for group sequential designs with two endpoints.
Schüler S; Kieser M; Rauch G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28789615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interim analysis and sample size reassessment.
Posch M; Bauer P
Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1170-6. PubMed ID: 11129475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic survey of randomised trials that stopped early for reasons of futility.
Walter SD; Han H; Guyatt GH; Bassler D; Bhatnagar N; Gloy V; Schandelmaier S; Briel M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 31948397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel Bayesian adaptive design incorporating both primary and secondary endpoints for randomized IIB chemoprevention study of women at increased risk for breast cancer.
Gajewski BJ; Kimler BF; Koestler DC; Mudaranthakam DP; Young K; Fabian CJ
Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):981. PubMed ID: 36471449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upstrapping to determine futility: predicting future outcomes nonparametrically from past data.
Wild JL; Ginde AA; Lindsell CJ; Kaizer AM
Trials; 2024 May; 25(1):312. PubMed ID: 38725072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
