BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30694570)

  • 1. Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H
    Pathol Int; 2019 Feb; 69(2):55-66. PubMed ID: 30694570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
    Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
    Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Samaratunga H
    APMIS; 2016 Jun; 124(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 27150257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].
    Kristiansen G; Egevad L; Amin M; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA; Epstein JI;
    Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26809207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Duffy D; LeFevre I; Johannsen S; Egevad L; Yaxley J
    Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate cancer glands with cribriform architecture and with glomeruloid features should be considered as Gleason pattern 4 and not pattern 3.
    Minardi D; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Massari F; Ciccarese C; Lopez-Beltran A; Cheng L; Montironi R
    Future Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(12):1431-3. PubMed ID: 27189718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    van Leenders GJLH; van der Kwast TH; Grignon DJ; Evans AJ; Kristiansen G; Kweldam CF; Litjens G; McKenney JK; Melamed J; Mottet N; Paner GP; Samaratunga H; Schoots IG; Simko JP; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Warren AY; Wheeler TM; Williamson SR; Iczkowski KA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Aug; 44(8):e87-e99. PubMed ID: 32459716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
    Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
    Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases].
    Wang G; Shen D
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 43(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 25567594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.
    Egevad L; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading for prostatic adenocarcinoma in thin core biopsies using TROG 03.04 'RADAR' trial clinical data.
    Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Steigler A; Murray JD; Atkinson C; Matthews J; Duchesne G; Spry NA; Christie D; Joseph D; Attia J; Denham JW
    Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26325671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
    Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prostate cancer. Part 2: Review of the various tumor grading systems over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].
    Helpap B; Bubendorf L; Kristiansen G
    Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26792002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.
    Montironi R; Santoni M; Mazzucchelli R; Burattini L; Berardi R; Galosi AB; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Scarpelli M
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2016; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 27008205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
    Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.