These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30694728)

  • 1. Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.
    Bernstein BO; Lubinski D; Benbow CP
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Mar; 30(3):444-454. PubMed ID: 30694728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity.
    Park G; Lubinski D; Benbow CP
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):957-61. PubMed ID: 19000201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later.
    Lubinski D; Benbow CP; Kell HJ
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2217-32. PubMed ID: 25384550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.
    McCabe KO; Lubinski D; Benbow CP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Aug; 119(2):390-416. PubMed ID: 30869985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
    Wang MT; Ye F; Degol JL
    J Youth Adolesc; 2017 Aug; 46(8):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 27975183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years.
    Park G; Lubinski D; Benbow CP
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Nov; 18(11):948-52. PubMed ID: 17958707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
    Wang MT; Eccles JS; Kenny S
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 23508740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Creativity and technical innovation: spatial ability's unique role.
    Kell HJ; Lubinski D; Benbow CP; Steiger JH
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1831-6. PubMed ID: 23846718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Creativity anxiety: Evidence for anxiety that is specific to creative thinking, from STEM to the arts.
    Daker RJ; Cortes RA; Lyons IM; Green AE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jan; 149(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 31219299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial Processing in Infancy Predicts Both Spatial and Mathematical Aptitude in Childhood.
    Lauer JE; Lourenco SF
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 27528464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Who rises to the top? Early indicators.
    Kell HJ; Lubinski D; Benbow CP
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):648-59. PubMed ID: 23531483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When Lightning Strikes Twice: Profoundly Gifted, Profoundly Accomplished.
    Makel MC; Kell HJ; Lubinski D; Putallaz M; Benbow CP
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1004-18. PubMed ID: 27225220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.
    Subotnik RF; Olszewski-Kubilius P; Worrell FC
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2011 Jan; 12(1):3-54. PubMed ID: 26168418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades.
    Lubinski D; Benbow CP; Webb RM; Bleske-Rechek A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 16507058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who needs innate ability to succeed in math and literacy? Academic-domain-specific theories of intelligence about peers versus adults.
    Gunderson EA; Hamdan N; Sorhagen NS; D'Esterre AP
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Jun; 53(6):1188-1205. PubMed ID: 28383932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attracting STEM talent: do STEM students prefer traditional or work/life-interaction labs?
    DeFraine WC; Williams WM; Ceci SJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89801. PubMed ID: 24587044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining academic-track boys' underachievement in language grades: Not a lack of aptitude but students' motivational beliefs and parents' perceptions?
    Heyder A; Kessels U; Steinmayr R
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2017 Jun; 87(2):205-223. PubMed ID: 28197995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive ability and math computation developmental relations with math problem solving: An integrated, multigroup approach.
    Villeneuve EF; Hajovsky DB; Mason BA; Lewno BM
    Sch Psychol Q; 2019 Jan; 34(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 29985022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: a multivariate approach to the Cox data.
    Simonton DK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1976 Feb; 33(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 1271211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood.
    Ferriman K; Lubinski D; Benbow CP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):517-32. PubMed ID: 19686005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.