BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30694822)

  • 1. ECG clues for false ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction activations.
    Agrawal A; Lu M; Kanjanahattakij N; Jeon HD; Romero-Corral A; Figueredo V; Pressman G
    Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Sep; 30(6):406-412. PubMed ID: 30694822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causes of Prehospital Misinterpretations of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Bosson N; Sanko S; Stickney RE; Niemann J; French WJ; Jollis JG; Kontos MC; Taylor TG; Macfarlane PW; Tadeo R; Koenig W; Eckstein M
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2017; 21(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 27858506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancellation of the Cardiac Catheterization Lab After Activation for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Lange DC; Conte S; Pappas-Block E; Hildebrandt D; Nakamura M; Makkar R; Kar S; Torbati S; Geiderman J; McNeil N; Cercek B; Tabak SW; Rokos I; Henry TD
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 Aug; 11(8):e004464. PubMed ID: 30354373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performance of a new ECG algorithm for reducing false positive cases in patients suspected acute coronary syndrome.
    Fakhri Y; Andersson H; Gregg RE; Babaeizadeh S; Kastrup J; Holmvang L; Clemmensen P
    J Electrocardiol; 2021; 69():60-64. PubMed ID: 34571467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of pre-hospital electrocardiograms on time to treatment and one year outcome in a rural regional ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction network.
    Kahlon TS; Barn K; Akram MM; Blankenship JC; Bower-Stout C; Carey DJ; Sun H; Tompkins Weber K; Skelding KA; Scott TD; Green SM; Berger PB
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 27142567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of prehospital electrocardiogram interpretation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction utilizing computer interpretation and transmission for interventional cardiologist consultation.
    Faour A; Cherrett C; Gibbs O; Lintern K; Mussap CJ; Rajaratnam R; Leung DY; Taylor DA; Faddy SC; Lo S; Juergens CP; French JK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 100(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 35766040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Catheterization laboratory activations and time intervals for patients with pre-hospital ECGs.
    Muhrbeck J; Persson J; Hofman-Bang C
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2018 Apr; 52(2):74-79. PubMed ID: 29361856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the vessel-specific leads (VSLs) for detection of acute ischemia on a dataset with non-ischemic ST-segment deviation.
    Wang JJ; Pahlm O; Wagner GS; Warren JW; Horáček BM; Sapp JL
    J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(6):800-806. PubMed ID: 27662776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency and factors associated with inappropriate for intervention cardiac catheterization laboratory activation.
    Patel A; Parikh R; Poddar KL; Ellis SG; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Jun; 17(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 27150501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Right bundle branch block in patients with suspected myocardial infarction.
    Neumann JT; Sörensen NA; Rübsamen N; Ojeda F; Schäfer S; Keller T; Blankenberg S; Clemmensen P; Westermann D
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2019 Mar; 8(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 30362813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block and Anterior Wall ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (From a Nationwide Study Using the National Inpatient Sample).
    Shrivastav R; Perimbeti S; Casso-Dominguez A; Jneid H; Kwan T; Tamis-Holland JE
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Feb; 140():20-24. PubMed ID: 33147431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of a Prehospital Wireless 12-Lead Electrocardiogram and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Tanguay A; Brassard E; Lebon J; Bégin F; Hébert D; Paradis JM
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 119(4):553-559. PubMed ID: 27939226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Criteria for ECG detection of acute myocardial ischemia: Sensitivity versus specificity.
    Wang JJ; Pahlm O; Warren JW; Sapp JL; Horáček BM
    J Electrocardiol; 2018; 51(6S):S12-S17. PubMed ID: 30177366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk score to predict false-positive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis.
    Kim JH; Roh YH; Park YS; Park JM; Joung BY; Park IC; Chung SP; Kim MJ
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2017 Jun; 25(1):61. PubMed ID: 28666458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for improving arrival-to-electrocardiogram time in emergency department chest pain patients and the effect on door-to-balloon time for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Takakuwa KM; Burek GA; Estepa AT; Shofer FS
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 16(10):921-7. PubMed ID: 19754862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective description and analysis of consecutive catheterization laboratory ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction activations with proposal, rationale, and use of a new classification scheme.
    Mixon TA; Suhr E; Caldwell G; Greenberg RD; Colato F; Blackwell J; Jo CH; Dehmer GJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jan; 5(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 22147883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Role of ECG in the Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndromes: an Old but Indispensable Tool.
    Birnbaum Y; Rankinen J; Jneid H; Atar D; Nikus K
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2022 Feb; 24(2):109-118. PubMed ID: 35028816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New or presumably new left bundle branch block in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: Clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic features from a single-center registry.
    Hanna EB; Lathia VN; Ali M; Deschamps EH
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 25981236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrocardiographic parameters effectively predict ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in acute phase and abnormal cardiac function in chronic phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Yu Z; Chen Z; Wu Y; Chen R; Li M; Chen X; Qin S; Liang Y; Su Y; Ge J
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 29(5):756-766. PubMed ID: 29399929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic test accuracy of life-threatening electrocardiographic findings (ST-elevation myocardial infarction equivalents) for acute coronary syndrome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation.
    Yoshimura S; Kiguchi T; Irisawa T; Yamada T; Yoshiya K; Park C; Nishimura T; Ishibe T; Kobata H; Kishimoto M; Kim SH; Ito Y; Sogabe T; Morooka T; Sakamoto H; Suzuki K; Onoe A; Matsuyama T; Matsui S; Nishioka N; Okada Y; Makino Y; Kimata S; Kawai S; Zha L; Kiyohara K; Kitamura T; Iwami T
    Resuscitation; 2023 Mar; 184():109700. PubMed ID: 36702338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.