161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30695085)
1. Effect of Different Bar Designs on Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 30695085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Different Designs of Milled Bar Attachments for Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
Mahrous AI; El Afandy HM; Elsyad MA; Mohamed SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(6):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 36450025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention and Stability of Rigid Telescopic and Milled Bar Attachments for Implant-Supported Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Soliman TA; Khalifa AK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e127–e133. PubMed ID: 29894548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Elhaddad AA; Khirallah AS
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):568-576. PubMed ID: 27589487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention and Stability Characteristics of Soft-Liner and Clip Attachments Used for Bar/Implant-Assisted Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
Denewar MM; Abdelmawgood EI; ELsyad MA; Al-Tonbary GY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(6):1095–1103. PubMed ID: 34157064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e666-e674. PubMed ID: 29143403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Agha NN; Habib AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1040-8. PubMed ID: 27632258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of denture cleaning solutions on the retention of Hader bar clips.
Küçükekenci AS; Dede DÖ; Çelik E
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):350.e1-350.e6. PubMed ID: 33198989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Labial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Different Resilient Stud Attachments for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: An In vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ibrahim AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):381–389. PubMed ID: 30703183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention characteristics of different attachment systems of mandibular overdentures retained by two or three implants.
Uludag B; Polat S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1509-13. PubMed ID: 23189303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars: maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept--a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 18548933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
