161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30695085)
21. The Influence of Implant Inclination on Retention and Peri-implant Stresses of Stud-Retained Implant Overdentures During Axial and Nonaxial Dislodgments: An In Vitro Study.
Alameldeen HE; Elsyad MA; Shawky AF; Khirallah AS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):543-550. PubMed ID: 32406652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Overdentures in the edentulous mandible supported by implants and retained by a Dolder bar: a 5-year prospective study.
Heschl A; Payer M; Clar V; Stopper M; Wegscheider W; Lorenzoni M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):589-99. PubMed ID: 21834860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of Rigid Bar and Nonrigid Double Crown Attachments on Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study with Differential Bone Quality.
Kimura T; Yang TC; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):764-769. PubMed ID: 30024991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of Attachment Type on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Part 1. Overdenture with Palate.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):815-821. PubMed ID: 28708913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
Tokar E; Uludag B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 1. Overdenture with Palate.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1308–1314. PubMed ID: 28938033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does the retention system influence the stability of implant-supported maxillary overdentures? A comparison with fixed and conventional dentures.
Michelon MMM; Posch AT; Sampaio-Filho HR; Lourenco EJV; Telles DM
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 30033158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.
Sadig W
Quintessence Int; 2009 Apr; 40(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 19417876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cleansability of and patients' satisfaction with implant-retained overdentures: a retrospective comparison of two attachment methods.
Ambard AJ; Fanchiang JC; Mueninghoff L; Dasanayake AP
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Sep; 133(9):1237-42; quiz 1261. PubMed ID: 12356255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Marginal bone loss and prosthetic maintenance of bar-retained implant-supported overdentures: a prospective study.
Akca K; Cehreli MC; Uysal S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 20209196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of Attachment Type on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Part 2. Palateless Overdentures.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 29340347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 2: Palateless Dentures.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Tomita A; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):357-364. PubMed ID: 29534124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of Different Degrees of Mesial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained with Stud Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Abo Hatem OE; Shawky AF; Emera RMK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):259–268. PubMed ID: 29028850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Complications with computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured titanium and soldered gold bars for mandibular implant-overdentures: short-term observations.
Katsoulis J; Wälchli J; Kobel S; Gholami H; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e75-85. PubMed ID: 23915228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures.
Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
