These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
827 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30695088)
1. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides. Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study. Schnutenhaus S; Gröller S; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area. Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial. Kiatkroekkrai P; Takolpuckdee C; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 49(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 31543382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter? Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of postoperative intraoral scan versus cone beam computerised tomography to measure accuracy of guided implant placement-A prospective clinical study. Skjerven H; Olsen-Bergem H; Rønold HJ; Riis UH; Ellingsen JE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):531-541. PubMed ID: 31002415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Surgical Template on the Accuracy of Implant Placement. Xu LW; You J; Zhang JX; Liu YF; Peng W J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):641-646. PubMed ID: 26619380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers? Deeb GR; Allen RK; Hall VP; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Bencharit S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. PubMed ID: 28863884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study. Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]