361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30695772)
1. Geometric discrepancy of image-guided radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer without implanted fiducial markers using a commercial pseudo-CT generation method.
Kan H; Eguchi Y; Tsuchiya T; Kondo T; Kitagawa Y; Mekata Y; Fukuma H; Yoshida R; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):06NT01. PubMed ID: 30695772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of MRI-based reference images for image-guided radiotherapy of the pelvis with either cone-beam computed tomography or planar localization images.
Korhonen J; Kapanen M; Sonke JJ; Wee L; Salli E; Keyriläinen J; Seppälä T; Tenhunen M
Acta Oncol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):889-95. PubMed ID: 25233439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Tanabe S; Utsunomiya S; Abe E; Sato H; Ohta A; Sakai H; Yamada T; Kaidu M; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):53-59. PubMed ID: 31054217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PTV margin definition in hypofractionated IGRT of localized prostate cancer using cone beam CT and orthogonal image pairs with fiducial markers.
Oehler C; Lang S; Dimmerling P; Bolesch C; Kloeck S; Tini A; Glanzmann C; Najafi Y; Studer G; Zwahlen DR
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Nov; 9():229. PubMed ID: 25384898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a commercial DIR platform for contour propagation in prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT.
Hammers JE; Pirozzi S; Lindsay D; Kaidar-Person O; Tan X; Chen RC; Das SK; Mavroidis P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):14-25. PubMed ID: 32058663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel approach for establishing benchmark CBCT/CT deformable image registrations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Kim J; Kumar S; Liu C; Zhong H; Pradhan D; Shah M; Cattaneo R; Yechieli R; Robbins JR; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):8077-97. PubMed ID: 24171908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating deformable image registration and scatter correction for CBCT-based dose calculation in adaptive IMPT.
Kurz C; Kamp F; Park YK; Zöllner C; Rit S; Hansen D; Podesta M; Sharp GC; Li M; Reiner M; Hofmaier J; Neppl S; Thieke C; Nijhuis R; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Winey BA; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5635. PubMed ID: 27782706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative cone-beam CT imaging in radiation therapy using planning CT as a prior: first patient studies.
Niu T; Al-Basheer A; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1991-2000. PubMed ID: 22482620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic Substitute Computed Tomography Generation and Contouring for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Alone External Beam Radiation Therapy From Standard MRI Sequences.
Dowling JA; Sun J; Pichler P; Rivest-Hénault D; Ghose S; Richardson H; Wratten C; Martin J; Arm J; Best L; Chandra SS; Fripp J; Menk FW; Greer PB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Dec; 93(5):1144-53. PubMed ID: 26581150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification.
Moteabbed M; Sharp GC; Wang Y; Trofimov A; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):196-205. PubMed ID: 25563260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.
Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel approach for evaluation of prostate deformation and associated dosimetric implications in IGRT of the prostate.
Mayyas E; Kim J; Kumar S; Liu C; Wen N; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091709. PubMed ID: 25186384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are cone beam CT image matching skills transferrable from planning CT to planning MRI for MR-only prostate radiotherapy?
Brooks RL; McCallum HM; Pearson RA; Pilling K; Wyatt J
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210146. PubMed ID: 33914617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical 3D/4D CBCT-based treatment dose monitoring system.
Qin A; Gersten D; Liang J; Liu Q; Grill I; Guerrero T; Stevens C; Yan D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):166-176. PubMed ID: 30306710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the correlation between prostatic displacement and rectal deformation using the Dice similarity coefficient of the rectum.
Tanabe Y; Ishida T; Eto H; Sera T; Emoto Y
Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):e39-e43. PubMed ID: 30642696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analyses of the factors influencing the accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in comparison with cone-beam CT in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation.
Zhou S; Luo L; Li J; Lin M; Chen L; Shao J; Lu S; Ma Y; Zhang Y; Chen W; Liu M; Liu S; He L
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):22. PubMed ID: 30696488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative assessment of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional ultrasound and cone beam CT.
Li M; Ballhausen H; Hegemann NS; Ganswindt U; Manapov F; Tritschler S; Roosen A; Gratzke C; Reiner M; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():82. PubMed ID: 25890013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam computed tomography-based dose calculation with deformable image registration using Hounsfield unit modifications.
Onozato Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Arai K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Kishi K; Umezawa R; Matsushita H; Jingu K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 24685445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching.
Kidar HS; Azizi H
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Nov; 13(1):217. PubMed ID: 30404657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
