282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30696329)
1. When Times Get Tough: Savoring and Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Coping with a Stressful Life Event.
Samios C; Khatri V
Anxiety Stress Coping; 2019 Mar; 32(2):125-140. PubMed ID: 30696329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Couple adjustment to a stressful life event: a dyadic investigation of the roles of positive reframing and perceived benefits.
Samios C; Baran S
Anxiety Stress Coping; 2018 Mar; 31(2):188-205. PubMed ID: 29272954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Associations between body dissatisfaction and relationship functioning among same-sex female couples: An actor-partner interdependence model.
Sandoval CM; Romano KA; Heron KE; Dawson CA; Sutton TG; Winstead BA; Lewis RJ
J Fam Psychol; 2022 Aug; 36(5):780-790. PubMed ID: 34968096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual and Partner Correlates of Sexual Satisfaction and Relationship Happiness in Midlife Couples: Dyadic Analysis of the International Survey of Relationships.
Fisher WA; Donahue KL; Long JS; Heiman JR; Rosen RC; Sand MS
Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1609-20. PubMed ID: 25370356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of sexual self-disclosure to sexual satisfaction and functioning in committed relationships.
Rehman US; Rellini AH; Fallis E
J Sex Med; 2011 Nov; 8(11):3108-15. PubMed ID: 21883943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supportive, Delegated, and Common Dyadic Coping Mediates the Association between Adult Attachment Representation and Relationship Satisfaction: A Dyadic Approach.
Wendołowska A; Steć M; Czyżowska D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minority stress and relationship functioning among young male same-sex couples: An examination of actor-partner interdependence models.
Feinstein BA; McConnell E; Dyar C; Mustanski B; Newcomb ME
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2018 May; 86(5):416-426. PubMed ID: 29683699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dyadic and longitudinal investigation of adjustment in couples coping with multiple sclerosis.
Samios C; Pakenham KI; O'Brien J
Ann Behav Med; 2015 Feb; 49(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 24993291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Couples coping with multiple sclerosis: a dyadic perspective on the roles of mindfulness and acceptance.
Pakenham KI; Samios C
J Behav Med; 2013 Aug; 36(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 22689212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Couples coping with sensory loss: A dyadic study of the roles of self- and perceived partner acceptance.
Lehane CM; Nielsen T; Wittich W; Langer S; Dammeyer J
Br J Health Psychol; 2018 Sep; 23(3):646-664. PubMed ID: 29602197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship Quality with Parents: Implications for Own and Partner Well-Being in Middle-Aged Couples.
Polenick CA; Fredman SJ; Birditt KS; Zarit SH
Fam Process; 2018 Mar; 57(1):253-268. PubMed ID: 28004851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The association between self-concealment from one's partner and relationship well-being.
Uysal A; Lin HL; Knee CR; Bush AL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Jan; 38(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22109250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disentangling acceptance: Direct and indirect effects of partner acceptance on felt acceptance and relationship satisfaction.
Rossman SM; Lerner RE; Córdova JV
J Fam Psychol; 2022 Apr; 36(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 34197160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Depression during pregnancy among young couples: the effect of personal and partner experiences of stressors and the buffering effects of social relationships.
Divney AA; Sipsma H; Gordon D; Niccolai L; Magriples U; Kershaw T
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 25(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 22578481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of the response to sexual difficulties scale.
Fallis EE; Purdon C; Rehman US
Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Jan; 42(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 22782144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct and indirect effects of commitment on interdependence and satisfaction in married couples.
Givertz M; Segrin C; Woszidlo A
J Fam Psychol; 2016 Mar; 30(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 26595588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Military couples' childhood experiences and romantic relationship satisfaction: The role of accepting influence.
Peterson C; O'Neal CW; Futris TG
Fam Process; 2022 Jun; 61(2):689-704. PubMed ID: 34189784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Savouring and psychological well-being in family dyads coping with cancer: An actor-partner interdependence model.
Hou WK; Liang L; Lau KM; Hall M
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Jul; 28(4):e13047. PubMed ID: 30993788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. COVID-19 psychological and financial stress and their links to drinking: A dyadic analysis in romantic couples.
Rodriguez LM; Litt DM; Stewart SH
Psychol Addict Behav; 2021 Jun; 35(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 34096760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of (un)employment on young couples' health and life satisfaction.
Haid ML; Seiffge-Krenke I
Psychol Health; 2013; 28(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 22963526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
