These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30696717)

  • 21. A model of active transcription hubs that unifies the roles of active promoters and enhancers.
    Zhu I; Song W; Ovcharenko I; Landsman D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 May; 49(8):4493-4505. PubMed ID: 33872375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Taking promoters out of enhancers in sequence based predictions of tissue-specific mammalian enhancers.
    Herman-Izycka J; Wlasnowolski M; Wilczynski B
    BMC Med Genomics; 2017 May; 10(Suppl 1):34. PubMed ID: 28589862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determinants of promoter and enhancer transcription directionality in metazoans.
    Ibrahim MM; Karabacak A; Glahs A; Kolundzic E; Hirsekorn A; Carda A; Tursun B; Zinzen RP; Lacadie SA; Ohler U
    Nat Commun; 2018 Oct; 9(1):4472. PubMed ID: 30367057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-throughput functional comparison of promoter and enhancer activities.
    Nguyen TA; Jones RD; Snavely AR; Pfenning AR; Kirchner R; Hemberg M; Gray JM
    Genome Res; 2016 Aug; 26(8):1023-33. PubMed ID: 27311442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computational prediction and experimental validation of novel Hedgehog-responsive enhancers linked to genes of the Hedgehog pathway.
    Gurdziel K; Vogt KR; Schneider G; Richards N; Gumucio DL
    BMC Dev Biol; 2016 Feb; 16():4. PubMed ID: 26912062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Orphan CpG islands define a novel class of highly active enhancers.
    Bell JSK; Vertino PM
    Epigenetics; 2017 Jun; 12(6):449-464. PubMed ID: 28448736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhancer prediction in the human genome by probabilistic modelling of the chromatin feature patterns.
    Osmala M; Lähdesmäki H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):317. PubMed ID: 32689977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional genome architectural CCCTC-binding factor makes choice in duplicated enhancers at Pcdhα locus.
    Wu Y; Jia Z; Ge X; Wu Q
    Sci China Life Sci; 2020 Jun; 63(6):835-844. PubMed ID: 32249388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. DNA methylation regulates discrimination of enhancers from promoters through a H3K4me1-H3K4me3 seesaw mechanism.
    Sharifi-Zarchi A; Gerovska D; Adachi K; Totonchi M; Pezeshk H; Taft RJ; Schöler HR; Chitsaz H; Sadeghi M; Baharvand H; Araúzo-Bravo MJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):964. PubMed ID: 29233090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting enhancers in mammalian genomes using supervised hidden Markov models.
    Zehnder T; Benner P; Vingron M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):157. PubMed ID: 30917778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NF-Y coassociates with FOS at promoters, enhancers, repetitive elements, and inactive chromatin regions, and is stereo-positioned with growth-controlling transcription factors.
    Fleming JD; Pavesi G; Benatti P; Imbriano C; Mantovani R; Struhl K
    Genome Res; 2013 Aug; 23(8):1195-209. PubMed ID: 23595228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gamma-globin gene promoter elements required for interaction with globin enhancers.
    Langdon SD; Kaufman RE
    Blood; 1998 Jan; 91(1):309-18. PubMed ID: 9414299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A machine learning approach for identifying novel cell type-specific transcriptional regulators of myogenesis.
    Busser BW; Taher L; Kim Y; Tansey T; Bloom MJ; Ovcharenko I; Michelson AM
    PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(3):e1002531. PubMed ID: 22412381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction-based approaches to characterize bidirectional promoters in the mammalian genome.
    Yang MQ; Elnitski LL
    BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 18366609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enhancer identification in mouse embryonic stem cells using integrative modeling of chromatin and genomic features.
    Chen CY; Morris Q; Mitchell JA
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Apr; 13():152. PubMed ID: 22537144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two promoters integrate multiple enhancer inputs to drive wild-type knirps expression in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo.
    Li L; Waymack R; Gad M; Wunderlich Z
    Genetics; 2021 Dec; 219(4):. PubMed ID: 34849867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling the Evolutionary Architectures of Transcribed Human Enhancer Sequences Reveals Distinct Origins, Functions, and Associations with Human Trait Variation.
    Fong SL; Capra JA
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Aug; 38(9):3681-3696. PubMed ID: 33973014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Epigenomic model of cardiac enhancers with application to genome wide association studies.
    Sahu AD; Aniba R; Chang YP; Hannenhalli S
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2013; ():92-102. PubMed ID: 23424115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. HS1,2 enhancer regulation of germline epsilon and gamma2b promoters in murine B lymphocytes: evidence for specific promoter-enhancer interactions.
    Laurencikiene J; Deveikaite V; Severinson E
    J Immunol; 2001 Sep; 167(6):3257-65. PubMed ID: 11544313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Regulatory landscape of enhancer-mediated transcriptional activation.
    Kawasaki K; Fukaya T
    Trends Cell Biol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):826-837. PubMed ID: 38355349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.